--- Additional Comments From salinger at sun dot felk dot cvut dot cz
2004-12-08 17:07 ---
Thanks for explanation.
The warning message was confusing for me.
Could be possible to distinguish between NULL without pointer conversion
and completely forgotten NULL ?
With something like
--- Additional Comments From salinger at sun dot felk dot cvut dot cz
2004-12-08 13:22 ---
> > NULL is expanded as __null in C++.
> > This is inconsistent with sentinel testing.
> Why do you think it is inconsistent?
For me it is inconsistent at least conceptualy.
In
MED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: salinger at sun dot felk dot cvut dot cz
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i486-redhat-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18886
