https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61815
--- Comment #3 from saisusheelsunkara at hotmail dot com ---
if it is following the precedence then output must have been 216?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61815
--- Comment #2 from saisusheelsunkara at hotmail dot com ---
its from left to right order?
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> The precedence of operators is being followed but what the C standard does
> not say which side of th
: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: saisusheelsunkara at hotmail dot com
int i=3,y;
y=++i*++i*++i;
printf("%d",y);
here the output being printed is 150? but as per precedence of operators the
output must have been 216 but instead of considering prece
