[Bug debug/111080] [11/12/13/14 Regression] restrict qualifier causes extra debug info to happen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111080 --- Comment #2 from sagebar at web dot de --- @Andrew Pinski Of course: yes. I did make a mistake there, but only for this case: > int (*fun_t)(struct foo *); // Leak (even w/o restrict!) asm: ... .globl fun_t

[Bug debug/111080] New: restrict qualifier leaks debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111080 Bug ID: 111080 Summary: restrict qualifier leaks debug info Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug bootstrap/110607] Makefile.in builds broken build-tools when CXXFLAGS is defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110607 --- Comment #2 from sagebar at web dot de --- @Andrew Pinski Sorry if this is a known bug. I simply checked the current gcc master (https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=Makefile.tpl;h=d0fe7e2fb778b3c3fa2cc8742e06cf1f78fdc5f2;hb=HEAD#l183)

[Bug driver/110607] New: Makefile.in build broken build-tools when CXXFLAGS is defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110607 Bug ID: 110607 Summary: Makefile.in build broken build-tools when CXXFLAGS is defined Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/105682] [12/13 Regression] Both `-Wsuggest-attribute=pure` and `-Wsuggest-attribute=const` on same function since r12-5177-g494bdadf28d0fb35

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105682 --- Comment #8 from sagebar at web dot de --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6) > I think the conlcusion here is correct. callee has pure attribute and that > means that it has no side effects except for reading global memory. So > whate

[Bug tree-optimization/105684] Bogus `-Warray-bounds` in partially allocated struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105684 --- Comment #3 from sagebar at web dot de --- >The issue is that 'result->data0.a' is (*result).data0.a, and so to GCC you are >accessing an object of type 'obj' for which there isn't enough allocated space. Technically true, and yes: not derefe

[Bug c/105689] New: Bogus `-Wstringop-overflow=` after accessing field, then containing struct (wrong "region size")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105689 Bug ID: 105689 Summary: Bogus `-Wstringop-overflow=` after accessing field, then containing struct (wrong "region size") Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/105685] New: Still Bogus `-Wsuggest-attribute=cold` on function already marked as `__attribute__((cold))`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105685 Bug ID: 105685 Summary: Still Bogus `-Wsuggest-attribute=cold` on function already marked as `__attribute__((cold))` Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/105684] New: Bogus `-Warray-bounds` in partially allocated struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105684 Bug ID: 105684 Summary: Bogus `-Warray-bounds` in partially allocated struct Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug c/105682] New: Both `-Wsuggest-attribute=pure` and `-Wsuggest-attribute=const` on same function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105682 Bug ID: 105682 Summary: Both `-Wsuggest-attribute=pure` and `-Wsuggest-attribute=const` on same function Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug c/105676] New: Bogus `-Wsuggest-attribute=pure` on function marked `__attribute__((const))`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105676 Bug ID: 105676 Summary: Bogus `-Wsuggest-attribute=pure` on function marked `__attribute__((const))` Product: gcc Version: 12.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: