[Bug fortran/98411] [10/11] Pointless: Array larger than ‘-fmax-stack-var-size=’, moved from stack to static storage for main program variables

2021-05-08 Thread ryofurue at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98411 Ryo Furue changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ryofurue at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/94931] request: print include path

2020-05-04 Thread ryofurue at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94931 --- Comment #6 from Ryo Furue --- Thanks again for your comments! > For a software developer, I > would put the libraries in ${INSTALLDIR}/lib and modules > in ${INSTALLDIR?/modules. INSTALLDIR could be /usr/local, > and, of course, you would d

[Bug fortran/94931] request: print include path

2020-05-03 Thread ryofurue at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94931 --- Comment #4 from Ryo Furue --- > There is only place gfortran will search for files that > it installs for intrinsic modules, openmp files, and > openacc files. There are no user files here. I see your point! So, should a library developer

[Bug fortran/94931] request: print include path

2020-05-03 Thread ryofurue at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94931 --- Comment #2 from Ryo Furue --- Thanks for the detailed description. > % gfcx -v -o z a.f90 | & grep -- -fin > > yields > > -fintrinsic-modules-path > /usr/home/kargl/work/lib/gcc/i586-unknown-freebsd13.0/10.0.0/finclude So, I wonder if it

[Bug fortran/94931] New: request: print include path

2020-05-02 Thread ryofurue at gmail dot com
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ryofurue at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- I'm not familiar with this bug tracker. I mean to submit a request, not a bug report. Sorry if I missed anything, but it seems to me that there is no (official) way to print the