[Bug middle-end/56964] ICE with -fno-sync-libcalls when target lacks atomic operations

2014-06-17 Thread rwahl at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56964 --- Comment #2 from rwahl at gmx dot de --- Just found out that the mentioned hangs in my last comment were caused by configuring gcc with --disable-checking so the asserts were removed.

[Bug middle-end/56964] ICE with -fno-sync-libcalls when target lacks atomic operations

2014-06-17 Thread rwahl at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56964 rwahl at gmx dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rwahl at gmx dot de --- Comment #1

[Bug rtl-optimization/57229] New: 4.6/4.7/4.8 inconsistent check for PRE_MODIFY/POST_MODIFY in post_reload

2013-05-09 Thread rwahl at gmx dot de
Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rwahl at gmx dot de Created attachment 30077 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30077&action=edit Proposed fix. I have found an inconsist

[Bug middle-end/43861] -Os creates larger binaries than before in some cases (-falign-... options enabled)

2010-05-02 Thread rwahl at gmx dot de
--- Comment #3 from rwahl at gmx dot de 2010-05-02 16:55 --- Created an attachment (id=20535) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20535&action=view) Disable alignment when using -Os The attached patch fixes the problem. It could be written in a more elegant

[Bug middle-end/43861] -Os creates larger binaries than before in some cases (-falign-... options enabled)

2010-04-22 Thread rwahl at gmx dot de
--- Comment #2 from rwahl at gmx dot de 2010-04-23 00:10 --- All my own cross compilers for ARM and x86 hosted on x86 and the native gcc in Fedora 12 (x86) show this behavior. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43861

[Bug middle-end/43861] New: -Os creates larger binaries than before in some cases (-falign-... options enabled)

2010-04-22 Thread rwahl at gmx dot de
ot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rwahl at gmx dot de http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43861

[Bug middle-end/43459] Invalid "may be used uninitialized in this function" warning with -Os

2010-03-22 Thread rwahl at gmx dot de
--- Comment #2 from rwahl at gmx dot de 2010-03-22 23:56 --- Just checked with gcc-4.4 branch HEAD and it works there, too. So it will be in gcc-4.4.4. I hope its released soon... ;-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43459

[Bug regression/43459] New: Invalid "may be used uninitialized in this function" warning with -Os

2010-03-20 Thread rwahl at gmx dot de
Product: gcc Version: 4.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: regression AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rwahl at gmx dot de http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43459