https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108342
--- Comment #12 from Rui Oliveira ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
> No, if you have the packed ph_fcomplex_t not aligned at alignof (float), you
> need
> to copy it to a properly aligned variable before trying to reinterpret_ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108342
--- Comment #10 from Rui Oliveira ---
So my options are to create like a placeholder, say
```c
typedef struct __attribute__((__packed__)) // Packed isn't really necessary
here I think?
{
float re, im;
} ph_fcomplex_t
```
To silence the w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108342
--- Comment #4 from Rui Oliveira ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Hmm: diff.cpp03.numerics
I saw you moved the bug to libstdc++ but is the problem libstdc++, or should
g++ just accept packing when it encounters it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108342
--- Comment #3 from Rui Oliveira ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
>
> I know about _Atomic and std::atomic but not std::complex and _Complex.
> Because std::complex was part of C++98 which was done before C99's _Complex
> ...
[c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108342
Bug ID: 108342
Summary: std::complex: ignoring packed attribute because of
unpacked non-POD field
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
