--- Comment #17 from ron_hylton at hotmail dot com 2006-06-21 19:51 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> All that said: does the problem persist? Could you repeat your tests with
> the latest snapshots to see whether this still happens?
>
> Thanks
> Wolfgang
>
The prob
--- Comment #13 from ron_hylton at hotmail dot com 2006-02-17 18:05 ---
>
> Are you sure you have enough virtual memory to compile this test case?
>
I just tried main branch r11 and the test case compiled fine. I have 2 GB
vm (and 2 GB ram) so I doubt the previous probl
--- Comment #10 from ron_hylton at hotmail dot com 2005-11-12 00:11 ---
Using gcc version 4.1.0 2005 (experimental) I still get a segfault for the
second test case with -O2.
$ gcc -c -O2 -v solveHestonVol2.ii
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-cygwin
Configured with: ../gcc
--- Comment #8 from ron_hylton at hotmail dot com 2005-11-05 18:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=10154)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10154&action=view)
modified test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24605
--- Comment #7 from ron_hylton at hotmail dot com 2005-11-05 18:49 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I tried out a few cross compilers for i686-pc-cygwin over the last few
> months. The code compiled cleanly on 20040607. Sometime between then
> and 20040709 it started faili
--- Comment #4 from ron_hylton at hotmail dot com 2005-11-03 16:00 ---
The code compiles with Intel C++ for Windows.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24605
--- Comment #1 from ron_hylton at hotmail dot com 2005-11-01 01:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=10093)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10093&action=view)
bz2 compressed .ii file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24605
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ron_hylton at hotmail dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24605
--- Additional Comments From ron_hylton at hotmail dot com 2004-11-10
16:20 ---
(In reply to comment #40)
> Ron, can you please attach your testcase that shows the problem to this PR?
>
> This PR is a regression on cygwin because the speed is back with 3.2.
This is the test c
