[Bug fortran/102145] TKR mismatches with -pedantic: -fallow-argument-mismatch does not degrade errors to warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102145 --- Comment #2 from ripero84 at gmail dot com --- 1) The gfortran manual has its own entries for -pedantic and -pedantic-errors: -Wpedantic -pedantic Issue warnings for uses of extensions to Fortran. -pedantic also applies to C

[Bug fortran/102145] New: TKR mismatches with -pedantic: -fallow-argument-mismatch does not degrade errors to warnings

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ripero84 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- In the presence of -pedantic, -fallow-argument-mismatch fails to degrade the

[Bug fortran/100662] intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 --- Comment #11 from ripero84 at gmail dot com --- Thank you very much for the information and your help.

[Bug fortran/100662] intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 ripero84 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ripero84 at gmail dot com

[Bug fortran/93309] Wrong error about duplicate implicit none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93309 --- Comment #7 from ripero84 at gmail dot com --- Thank you! - FYI, this behaviour was present in all versions I tried since GCC 5.

[Bug fortran/93309] Wrong error about duplicate implicit none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93309 --- Comment #4 from ripero84 at gmail dot com --- Thank you! Would it be possible to backport this fix to the other active branches?

[Bug fortran/93309] New: Wrong error about duplicate implicit none

: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ripero84 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- gfortran thinks the following module code is wrong: $ cat ine.f90 module m implicit none(external) contains subroutine s implicit none(external) end subroutine end

[Bug fortran/92805] gfortran: blanks within literal constants should not be allowed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92805 ripero84 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ripero84 at gmail dot com

[Bug fortran/92805] New: gfortran: blanks within literal constants should not be allowed

Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ripero84 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- I belive that when writing free source form and using kind parameters as part of integer, real, logical or character literal constants

[Bug fortran/82796] New: Private+equivalence in used module breaks compilation of pure function

Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ripero84 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- gfortran (multiple versions including 7.2.0, 6.4.0 and 5.4.1,) fails to compile the following code

[Bug fortran/81509] Wrong compilation error: iand/ieor/ior + boz + -std=f2008

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81509 --- Comment #2 from ripero84 at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 41807 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41807&action=edit Compilation output - gfortran v7.1.0

[Bug fortran/81509] Wrong compilation error: iand/ieor/ior + boz + -std=f2008

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81509 --- Comment #1 from ripero84 at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 41806 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41806&action=edit Compilation output - gfortran v6.4.0

[Bug fortran/81509] New: Wrong compilation error: iand/ieor/ior + boz + -std=f2008

Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ripero84 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 41805 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41805&action=edit Example source code When the fo