[Bug sanitizer/84428] ==7122==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../sanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cc:384 "((__interception::real___cxa_throw)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)

2018-04-10 Thread ribasushi at leporine dot io
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428 --- Comment #23 from Peter Rabbitson --- Could you please link the upstream issue you are referring to?

[Bug sanitizer/84428] ==7122==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../sanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cc:384 "((__interception::real___cxa_throw)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)

2018-03-29 Thread ribasushi at leporine dot io
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428 --- Comment #14 from Peter Rabbitson --- On 03/29/2018 01:35 PM, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > Can you please describe what exactly do you instrument? Is it a Perl package, > or a firebird? The failcase I provided in my first involvement

[Bug sanitizer/84428] ==7122==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../sanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cc:384 "((__interception::real___cxa_throw)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)

2018-03-29 Thread ribasushi at leporine dot io
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428 --- Comment #12 from Peter Rabbitson --- On 03/29/2018 12:21 PM, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428 > > --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška --- > (In reply to Peter Rabbitson from comment #10) >>

[Bug sanitizer/84428] ==7122==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../sanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cc:384 "((__interception::real___cxa_throw)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)

2018-03-29 Thread ribasushi at leporine dot io
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428 --- Comment #10 from Peter Rabbitson --- On 03/29/2018 11:27 AM, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > I'm sorry but I don't have Fedora system, I have only openSUSE. And there I > don't have any firebird-*devel package. > The steps are for Ubu

[Bug sanitizer/84428] ==7122==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../sanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cc:384 "((__interception::real___cxa_throw)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)

2018-03-29 Thread ribasushi at leporine dot io
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428 --- Comment #8 from Peter Rabbitson --- On 03/29/2018 10:57 AM, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428 > > --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- > So I rewrote it to a shell script: > > ... > > I

[Bug sanitizer/84428] ==7122==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../sanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cc:384 "((__interception::real___cxa_throw)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)

2018-03-28 Thread ribasushi at leporine dot io
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428 --- Comment #6 from Peter Rabbitson --- Basically I'd simply run the commands as listed in the .travis.yml file one after the other ;) The reason I provided this on travis is because the available environment is "static", and one can install/run

[Bug sanitizer/84428] ==7122==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../sanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cc:384 "((__interception::real___cxa_throw)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)

2018-03-28 Thread ribasushi at leporine dot io
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428 --- Comment #4 from Peter Rabbitson --- I should note also that the LD_PRELOAD is not a factor - I only used it to simplify the reproduction. A build with a fully instrumented stack fails the same way: https://travis-ci.org/Perl5/DBIx-Class/jobs

[Bug sanitizer/84428] ==7122==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../sanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cc:384 "((__interception::real___cxa_throw)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)

2018-03-28 Thread ribasushi at leporine dot io
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428 Peter Rabbitson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ribasushi at leporine dot io