https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121159
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121156
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121126
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 120924, which changed state.
Bug 120924 Summary: [15 Regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized regression on s390x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120924
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120924
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120003
Bug 120003 depends on bug 120924, which changed state.
Bug 120924 Summary: [15 Regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized regression on s390x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120924
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121049
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121035
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.1.1
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121059
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|15.2|13.5
Summary|[15 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120924
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||false-positive
--- Comment #3 from Ric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121143
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||false-positive,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121126
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121126
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121126
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
That means previously the
/* FORNOW: we currently don't support the case that these phis
2029 are not used in the outerloop (unless it is double
reduction,
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121126
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
The following fails at -O2:
unsigned char a;
unsigned b;
int r[11];
static void __attribute__((noipa))
c(int e, unsigned s[][11][11])
{
for (int u = -(e ? 2000424973 : 0) - 2294542319; u < 7; u += 4)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120958
--- Comment #22 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #21)
> A pragmatic solution might be to pattern-match (by name) some of the
> affected APIs and exclude them from the fnspec processing that causes the
> issue.
Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120958
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener ---
A pragmatic solution might be to pattern-match (by name) some of the affected
APIs and exclude them from the fnspec processing that causes the issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120958
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
Note the fnspec would also affects scalars passed by reference, so depending on
how exactly the frontend infers it testcases that are "miscompiled" by
functions stowing away a reference to the passed objec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121131
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
,
||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
t.c:3:28: note: node 0x4b89f80 (max_nunits=16, refcnt=1) vector(16) char
t.c:3:28: note: op template: _1 = .MASK_CALL (w7, _20);
t.c:3:28: note
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121129
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2025-07-17
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Confirmed. I will have a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120958
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
I had the impression we are talking about a legacy (F77) code base here and we
need to honor the constraints of that language. That means limited ways to
express inter-operability with C and thus from a Q
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121035
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
OK, so the issue is that during VN we do
Value numbering stmt = _1 = c;
Setting value number of _1 to g_15 (changed)
g_15 is available for g_15
Value numbering stmt = _2 = _1 << 1;
g_15 is available for g_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121049
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||16.0
Summary|[16 regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121116
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||16.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121120
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121101
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 61883
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61883&action=edit
patch for the gimple verifier
I had this patch for the GIMPLE verifier but it requires more refactoring
aroun
||accepts-invalid
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121049
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
I think the issue is that we do
_79 = _78 > { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 };
vect__12.20_57 = .MASK_LOAD (vectp_mon_lengths.19_51, 256B, _79, { 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0 });
vect_patt_18.21_58 = WIDEN_MULT_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121116
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,
|
|ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2025-07-16
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Confirmed. We get to build a vector short from bit16 elements.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121112
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
--- Comment #1 from Rich
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121103
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Confirmed.
>
> When `memmove(p->d, a.s, a.n);` is folded into:
>
> ;; basic block 3, loop depth 0
> ;;pred: 2
> _7 = MEM [(char * {ref-all})&c]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121108
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121103
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
We have a read from a FUNCTION_DECL. This should be invalid GIMPLE (reading
from the insn stream should be OK, but not via an [rl]value of function type).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121099
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121096
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121093
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
we don't elide inlined_function_outer_scope_p IIRC, so not sure why this would
happen? But the flow of conditions is a bit odd:
/* When not generating debug info we can eliminate info on unused
v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121089
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121072
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Feels like a bool pattern issue, or some missed post-sanity check during live
operation vectorization.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121075
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121074
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121073
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121065
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120980
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121059
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 regression] ICE when|[15/16 regression] ICE when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121059
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||16.0
Summary|[15/16 regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121059
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone|16.0|15.2
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
I will have a look somewhen later this week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121055
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121049
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||riscv
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121037
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Might be enough of a change to identify the problematic loop. I'll queue, but
don't hesitate to beat me to it ;)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121035
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120987
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #15)
> (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #14)
> > I've managed to write a synthetic example:
>
> I've bisect this to:
> ...
> commit 4d6132e59327e809a4d4e39fb94
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121034
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97106
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.0|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119748
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49372
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.0|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64334
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.0|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117822
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103616
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103416
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104620
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110572
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98218
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120384
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15] |[13/14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103253
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78391
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|---
|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
8405 unsigned effec_reduc_ncopies
8406= vect_get_num_copies (loop_vinfo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82601
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98424
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.0|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120944
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|13.5
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103069
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120936
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|13.5
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108770
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.4|13.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120759
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|13.5
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104696
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120532
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|13.5
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99179
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119851
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.4|13.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113841
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120425
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|13.5
--- Comment #11 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120756
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|13.5
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108986
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|12.3
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120133
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|13.5
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120689
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|13.5
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102587
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120012
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|13.5
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102378
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120685
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|13.5
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101456
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119690
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|13.5
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96088
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.0|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120667
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.5|13.5
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
1 - 100 of 19060 matches
Mail list logo