[Bug fortran/30981] a ** exp fails for integer exponents if exp is "-huge()-1" (endless loop)

2007-02-27 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
--- Comment #6 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2007-02-27 19:57 --- Subject: Re: a ** exp fails for integer exponents if exp is "-huge()-1" (endless loop) On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc do

[Bug fortran/30981] a ** exp fails for integer exponents if exp is "-huge()-1" (endless loop)

2007-02-27 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
--- Comment #4 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2007-02-27 19:52 --- Subject: Re: a ** exp fails for integer exponents if exp is "-huge()-1" (endless loop) On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot g

[Bug fortran/30981] Program "Hangs"

2007-02-27 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
--- Comment #2 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2007-02-27 18:00 --- Subject: Re: Program "Hangs" On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-27 17:07 > --- >

[Bug fortran/30981] New: Program "Hangs"

2007-02-27 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
Version: 4.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ray at ultramarine dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30981

[Bug fortran/30713] Internal Complier Error

2007-02-06 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
--- Comment #5 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2007-02-06 17:00 --- Subject: Re: Internal Complier Error On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-06 16:34 > --- > Not that it

[Bug fortran/30713] Internal Complier Error

2007-02-06 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
--- Comment #2 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2007-02-06 15:39 --- Subject: Re: Internal Complier Error On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-06 15:36 --- > There is no attache

[Bug fortran/30713] New: Internal Complier Error

2007-02-06 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ray at ultramarine dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30713

[Bug bootstrap/28124] Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6

2006-06-21 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
--- Comment #2 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2006-06-21 15:00 --- Subject: Re: Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6 On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 14:58 > --- > W

[Bug bootstrap/28124] New: Cannot build gcc on OSX 10.4 G6

2006-06-21 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ray at ultramarine dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28124

[Bug fortran/27757] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Problems with direct access io

2006-05-28 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
--- Comment #13 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2006-05-28 19:06 --- Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] Problems with direct access io On Sat, 28 May 2006, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05

[Bug fortran/27757] Problems with direct access io

2006-05-27 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
--- Comment #11 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2006-05-27 20:53 --- Subject: Re: Problems with direct access io I believe I said that in the bug report. On Sat, 27 May 2006, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #10 from tkoenig at gcc dot gn

[Bug fortran/27757] Problems with direct access io

2006-05-27 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
--- Comment #9 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2006-05-27 12:21 --- Subject: Re: Problems with direct access io Good work, knew this would be hard! Ray On Sat, 27 May 2006, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gn

[Bug fortran/27757] Problems with direct access io

2006-05-24 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
--- Comment #5 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2006-05-25 02:17 --- Subject: Re: Problems with direct access io On Wed, 25 May 2006, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 01:20 > ---

[Bug fortran/27757] Problems with direct access io

2006-05-24 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
--- Comment #3 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2006-05-25 01:03 --- Subject: Re: Problems with direct access io On Wed, 25 May 2006, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 00:51 > --- >

[Bug fortran/27757] Problems with direct access io

2006-05-24 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
--- Comment #1 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2006-05-24 14:58 --- Created an attachment (id=11505) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11505&action=view) source and results -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27757

[Bug fortran/27757] New: Problems with direct access io

2006-05-24 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ray at ultramarine dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27757

[Bug c/27350] Fortran function returns are not correct in c on X86_64

2006-04-28 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
--- Comment #1 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2006-04-28 14:25 --- Created an attachment (id=11343) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11343&action=view) All necessary files to produce the bug go is a csh script that compiles the fortran, compiles the c, li

[Bug c/27350] New: Fortran function returns are not correct in c on X86_64

2006-04-28 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
NCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ray at ultramarine dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27350

[Bug c/27349] New: Fortran function returns are not correct in c on X86_64

2006-04-28 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
ReportedBy: ray at ultramarine dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27349

[Bug libfortran/24919] GFORTRAN input and carriage returns

2005-11-21 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
--- Comment #10 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2005-11-21 13:52 --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Tried yesterday's snapshot of 4.1 and it still does not work. > > OK, I'm on it. Looks like someone forgot about CRLF systems :) >

[Bug fortran/24923] iostat on read

2005-11-18 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
--- Comment #5 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2005-11-18 20:51 --- Subject: Re: iostat on read On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 20:03 > --- > (In repl

[Bug libfortran/24919] GFORTRAN input and carriage returns

2005-11-18 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
--- Comment #8 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2005-11-18 19:32 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Subject: Re: GFORTRAN input and carriage returns > > On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > > > > > --- Comment #2 from pinski

[Bug fortran/24923] iostat on read

2005-11-18 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
--- Comment #3 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2005-11-18 19:30 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Actually this has already been fixed for 4.0.3 at least: > open ios0 > read ios3 > buf 1 2 -77 -77 > Due to other bugs, I t

[Bug libfortran/24919] GFORTRAN input and carriage returns

2005-11-17 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
--- Comment #3 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2005-11-17 20:28 --- Subject: Re: GFORTRAN input and carriage returns On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 20:13 > --- >

[Bug fortran/24923] New: iostat on read

2005-11-17 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
Product: gcc Version: 4.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ray at ultramarine dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24923

[Bug fortran/24921] New: iostat on read

2005-11-17 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
-- Summary: iostat on read Product: gcc Version: 4.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ray at ultramarine dot

[Bug libfortran/24919] New: GFORTRAN input and carriage returns

2005-11-17 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
Summary: GFORTRAN input and carriage returns Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ray at ultramarine dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24919

[Bug libfortran/24918] New: GFORTRAN input and carriage returns

2005-11-17 Thread ray at ultramarine dot com
ReportedBy: ray at ultramarine dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24918