http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53059
--- Comment #10 from Evgeny Ratnikov 2012-04-23
02:47:37 UTC ---
Now it's clear. Thanks for replies.
.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53059
--- Comment #8 from Evgeny Ratnikov 2012-04-22
19:11:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > problem is that after such change my application (-std=98) linked with
> > libraries (-std=0x) causes corrupted stack.
>
> Yo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53059
--- Comment #6 from Evgeny Ratnikov 2012-04-22
08:47:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Why do you think this is a bug?
>
> The C++ 2011 standard requires that std::list::size() is O(1) so a new member
> variable is needed to store the contai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53059
--- Comment #5 from ratnikov.ev at ya dot ru 2012-04-22 03:26:43 UTC ---
Anyway there will be no backward compability.
I mean when I use a library compiled with gcc-4.7.0 + 0x with other code
compiled with pervious gcc versions (and vice versa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53059
--- Comment #1 from ratnikov.ev at ya dot ru 2012-04-21 12:23:36 UTC ---
g++ -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i486-slackware-linux/4.7.0/specs
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/i486-slackware-linux/4.7.0/lto-wrapper
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53059
Bug #: 53059
Summary: sizeof(std::list)=12 was 8 in previous releases
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
