--- Comment #3 from randolph at tausq dot org 2006-09-24 23:48 ---
Subject: Re: [hppa] Missing address increment
optimization for fp load/stores
>> gcc starting from 4.0 produces this:
>>
>> .L3:
>> fldds -16(%r26),%fr22
>> fldds -8(%r26)
--- Comment #3 from randolph at tausq dot org 2006-03-02 14:27 ---
Subject: Re: gcc generates code that does not allow retrieval
of struct arguments with debugger
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-02 12
--- Additional Comments From randolph at tausq dot org 2005-08-15 15:18
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] build_range_check
generates wrong code for funcptr comparison
>>1) gcc should not be canonicalizing constants casted as function pointers
>
> I think it has to.
--- Additional Comments From randolph at tausq dot org 2005-06-24 14:23
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Wrong code for function pointer comparision
during optimization
> The proposed patch has passed testing on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
confirmed on hppa-linux. works
--- Additional Comments From randolph at tausq dot org 2005-06-13 16:24
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Wrong code for function pointer comparision
during optimization
> I thought this was fixed.
Nope, sorry.
randolph
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22051
