[Bug tree-optimization/86724] Compilation error with new isl 0.20 (missing includes)

2018-07-29 Thread rainer.jung at kippdata dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86724 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Jung --- For the sake of completeness, I think the following isl change removed the implicit include chain that made the code work before isl 0.20: http://repo.or.cz/isl.git/commitdiff/406f2e9e067adb901c45284c65bfdc32e

[Bug tree-optimization/86724] New: Compilation error with new isl 0.20 (missing includes)

2018-07-29 Thread rainer.jung at kippdata dot de
Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rainer.jung at kippdata dot de Target Milestone: --- Compilation of 8.2.0 breaks in gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c .../graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:83:7: error: 'isl_id_free' was not declar

[Bug target/56890] invalid fdtox instruction in 64-bit mode with -O2

2013-04-15 Thread rainer.jung at kippdata dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890 --- Comment #12 from Rainer Jung 2013-04-15 15:34:42 UTC --- I tried the sparc.c patch on top of GCC 4.7.3 and it works. Thanks for fixing :)

[Bug target/56890] invalid fdtox instruction in 64-bit mode with -O2

2013-04-14 Thread rainer.jung at kippdata dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890 --- Comment #7 from Rainer Jung 2013-04-14 09:05:54 UTC --- I can confirm, that the test cases behave unchanged with 4.7.3. There's no problem with 4.8.0.

[Bug target/56890] Invalid fdtox %f8, %f9 on Sparc 64 Bits with -O2

2013-04-09 Thread rainer.jung at kippdata dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Jung 2013-04-09 08:55:25 UTC --- Forgot to post my configure line for gcc: ../gcc-4.7.2/configure --prefix=/opt/build/tools/gcc-4.7.2 --with-local-prefix=/opt/build/tools/gcc-4.7.2 --with-mpfr=/opt/build/tool

[Bug c/56890] Invalid fdtox %f8, %f9 on Sparc 64 Bits with -O2

2013-04-09 Thread rainer.jung at kippdata dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Jung 2013-04-09 08:40:40 UTC --- Created attachment 29837 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29837 Assembler file, problem in line 29 (fdtox %f8, %f9)

[Bug c/56890] Invalid fdtox %f8, %f9 on Sparc 64 Bits with -O2

2013-04-09 Thread rainer.jung at kippdata dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Jung 2013-04-09 08:38:02 UTC --- Created attachment 29836 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29836 Slightly bigger test case with additional error for -O1

[Bug c/56890] New: Invalid fdtox %f8, %f9 on Sparc 64 Bits with -O2

2013-04-09 Thread rainer.jung at kippdata dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890 Bug #: 56890 Summary: Invalid fdtox %f8, %f9 on Sparc 64 Bits with -O2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal