https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99693
--- Comment #5 from rafal at bursig dot org ---
Additional when I use c++ variant of this code and throw exception in else then
in -O2 level the 'if' is removed outside loop:
typedef struct Update {
int m_update;
//...
} Update;
extern
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99693
--- Comment #4 from rafal at bursig dot org ---
but using -O2 -funswitch-loops will bring me those problems why this flag is
not in default -O2. Which is not a solution.
Maybe -O2 may have weaken version of this optimization and will work only i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99693
--- Comment #1 from rafal at bursig dot org ---
I'm not saying that this is a regression because I see proper results on -O3
level but IMHO such results should be available in -O2 level... but to topic:
I have such code:
typedef struct Update {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99693
Bug ID: 99693
Summary: -O2 not move 'if' checks on const data outside the
loops
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio