https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108995
Bug ID: 108995
Summary: Missed signed integer overflow checks in UBsan?
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108880
Bug ID: 108880
Summary: slow compilation with "-fsanitize=undefined"
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108845
--- Comment #4 from Qirun Zhang ---
(In reply to Qirun Zhang from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> > I'm not convinced it is a good idea.
> > Sure, in the above case it is obvious it will never trigger, but if we say
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108845
--- Comment #3 from Qirun Zhang ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> I'm not convinced it is a good idea.
> Sure, in the above case it is obvious it will never trigger, but if we say
> use ranger to decide if the operation can or ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108845
Bug ID: 108845
Summary: Unnecessary signed integer overflow checks
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102149
--- Comment #1 from Qirun Zhang ---
My bisection points to g:89f33f44addbf9853bc3e6677d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102149
Bug ID: 102149
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101972
--- Comment #1 from Qirun Zhang ---
My bisection points to g:a81e2c6240655f60a49c16e0d8bbfd2ba40bba51
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101972
Bug ID: 101972
Summary: wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101885
--- Comment #1 from Qirun Zhang ---
My bisection points to g:529ea7d9596b26ba103578eeab448e9862a2d2c5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101885
Bug ID: 101885
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101615
--- Comment #1 from Qirun Zhang ---
My bisection points to g:6df6055d5c666e669890ff8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101615
Bug ID: 101615
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101501
--- Comment #1 from Qirun Zhang ---
My bisection points to g:287522613d661b4c5ba8403b051eb470c1674cba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101501
Bug ID: 101501
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101445
--- Comment #1 from Qirun Zhang ---
My bisection points to g:f75211822f8d84bb706421d3692e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101445
Bug ID: 101445
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101173
--- Comment #1 from Qirun Zhang ---
My bisection points to g:fbdec14e80e9399cd301ed3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101173
Bug ID: 101173
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101105
--- Comment #1 from Qirun Zhang ---
My bisection points to g:f75211822f8d84bb706421
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101105
Bug ID: 101105
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101025
--- Comment #8 from Qirun Zhang ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> Fixed on trunk sofar. Keep more testcases coming ;) (I have a hunch this
> code has more issues...)
Thanks, Richard. Will do.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101031
Qirun Zhang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101031
Bug ID: 101031
Summary: wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101025
Bug ID: 101025
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101001
Bug ID: 101001
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
26 matches
Mail list logo