https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78100
--- Comment #10 from Kevin Puetz ---
The godbolt recipe also nails down the other end of the version range - 5.4
produced something weirder still (a single DW_TAG_variable with
DW_AT_external=true, but also with DW_AT_location and DW_AT_upper_bou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78100
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Puetz ---
Found it: this is a duplicate of bug 91507, thus fixed by
r276403/31632e2c4327146ea8d21cff33adaa505b17d2bd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78100
--- Comment #7 from Kevin Puetz ---
Nope, falsified that guess - I just realized compiler explorer can do
dwarfdump, which makes it easy to bisect among the releases they have (if not
actually commit-by-commit). This shows that 9.5.0 (which has r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78100
Kevin Puetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||puetzk at puetzk dot org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95222
--- Comment #9 from Kevin Puetz ---
I accidentally dropped a word, meant to say:
I'm not directly arguing for (or against) a backport to (a hypothetical 9.5.0)
Just noting that this issue could also manifest as wrong-code, for
consideration in c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95222
Kevin Puetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||puetzk at puetzk dot org
--- Comment #8 fr
