--- Comment #3 from prthomas at drfccad dot cea dot fr 2005-10-18 11:54
---
Subject: RE: Equivalence broken since 20051013
Richard,
Yes indeed - it is fixed.
>From my log, I see that last night I only updated fortran and gfortran,
thereby missing your patch.
Thanks
P
--- Comment #2 from prthomas at drfccad dot cea dot fr 2005-10-18 09:59
---
Subject: RE: Equivalence broken since 20051013
Richard,
>
> --- Comment #1 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
> 2005-10-18 09:48 ---
> So, when was your last update? AFAIK this was fixe
--- Additional Comments From prthomas at drfccad dot cea dot fr 2005-07-21
07:47 ---
Subject: Re: Null Characters instead of blanks in t
extoutput
Steven,
I figured out the third (I was going to say "final"...) bug during the drive
to work.
I am not in a posi
--- Additional Comments From prthomas at drfccad dot cea dot fr 2005-04-06
13:22 ---
Subject: RE: parser confused by arithmetic if inside a
n if
> But then, some scientific libraries are using it (I was about
> to report the same
> bug when a search pointed to this
--- Additional Comments From prthomas at drfccad dot cea dot fr 2005-01-28
17:02 ---
Subject: RE: Runtime hang in LAPACK routine SLAMC1 - i
n Quetzal benchmark suite
Bon soir François-Xavier,
Tu as raison! Même -O1 fait coincer le programme.
Je suis étonné quand-même que le
--- Additional Comments From prthomas at drfccad dot cea dot fr 2004-12-02
16:24 ---
Subject: RE: Non explicit instantiation of module vari
able in MAIN causes ICE
The problem is indeed fixed in gcc-4.0 200141202.
Thanks, Andrew
Paul Thomas
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Additional Comments From prthomas at drfccad dot cea dot fr 2004-12-02
15:29 ---
Subject: RE: Non explicit instantiation of module vari
able in MAIN causes ICE
Andrew,
I likely will not be back to you until tomorrow. None of the available
snapshots compare with yours, so
--- Additional Comments From prthomas at drfccad dot cea dot fr 2004-12-02
14:24 ---
Subject: RE: Non explicit instantiation of module vari
able in MAIN causes ICE
Andrew,
> Looks like this has already been fixed unless this is a new ICE.
>
> I cannot reproduce it wi
