https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100227
Mathieu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.3.0
Known to fail|
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: priv123 at hotmail dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50657
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50657&action=edit
example code
The code in attachment runs properly with gfortran 6.3.0 with -O1 a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51267
--- Comment #7 from Mathieu 2011-11-25 09:37:15 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> This does not "fix" the problem. (Note, I initialized
> tab=42 and ius=1; otherwise, you reference an undefined
> variables.)
Steve, I can't reproduce that you o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51267
--- Comment #5 from Mathieu 2011-11-23 09:33:37 UTC
---
> -fno-tree-ds seems to do the trick: from the C manual
with -fno-tree-dse it works as I expect. Thanks.
Because reading the manual I didn't see this option (or more exactly I didn't
unde
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51267
--- Comment #2 from Mathieu 2011-11-22 20:22:15 UTC
---
Sure, and we are especially fans of -fbound-checks but we can not use it on
half of the code because of this usage.
For the story :
{
I reproduced here with this small code a part of the 1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51267
Bug #: 51267
Summary: loop optimization error using LOC function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
