[Bug c++/51836] New: -Wsequence-point fails when convoluted expressions with multiple side effects are used (C++03)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51836 Bug #: 51836 Summary: -Wsequence-point fails when convoluted expressions with multiple side effects are used (C++03) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.6

[Bug c/51834] -Wsequence-point fails when convoluted expressions with multiple side effects are used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51834 --- Comment #2 from Prasoon 2012-01-12 09:07:52 UTC --- @Richard Guenther Considering the expression i += (i,i++,i) +i; (i,i++,i) involves change in the value of i, however comma introduces a sequence point so very roughly considering it equiv

[Bug c/51834] New: -Wsequence-point fails when convoluted expressions with multiple side effects are used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51834 Bug #: 51834 Summary: -Wsequence-point fails when convoluted expressions with multiple side effects are used Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.6

[Bug c++/51584] New: Errorneous compilation when deriving from an inaccessible friend class.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51584 Bug #: 51584 Summary: Errorneous compilation when deriving from an inaccessible friend class. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug c++/51571] No named return value optimization while adding a dummy scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51571 Prasoon changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical

[Bug c++/51571] New: No named return value optimization while adding a dummy scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51571 Bug #: 51571 Summary: No named return value optimization while adding a dummy scope Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED