http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391
--- Comment #17 from pnewell at cs dot cmu.edu 2011-12-06 08:00:42 UTC ---
I am a bit afraid to do this, but I think I need to do it for my own education.
I saw the comment by Richard (#16) and have to admit that I would like a
translation into
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391
--- Comment #15 from pnewell at cs dot cmu.edu 2011-12-03 19:10:39 UTC ---
Manu:
Yes, Andrew did a great job of letting me know what the issue was and gave me
the necessary information to have a work-around within 1/2 hour. Fantastic
turnaround
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391
--- Comment #12 from pnewell at cs dot cmu.edu 2011-12-03 03:36:51 UTC ---
changed preferences, thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391
--- Comment #10 from pnewell at cs dot cmu.edu 2011-12-03 03:31:06 UTC ---
off-topic, but I added myself to the cc-list but don't get copies of my own
submissions, is that the way gcc bugzilla behaves (would be different than
redhat's for fedora)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391
--- Comment #9 from pnewell at cs dot cmu.edu 2011-12-03 03:29:03 UTC ---
I just tested on my Linux box and I am getting the results you suggest for -O2
and -O3. It is finding issues with -O, -Os, and -O1, but I think that is my
problem (barking
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391
--- Comment #7 from pnewell at cs dot cmu.edu 2011-12-03 03:18:50 UTC ---
Wow ... I never picked that up when trying to find the answer in the online GCC
docs. Thanks for the advice.
That being said, why would it work when I didn't hav
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391
--- Comment #4 from pnewell at cs dot cmu.edu 2011-12-03 03:13:49 UTC ---
Forgot to mention ... in my original discovery, I was seeing it occurring when
inlines were inside inlines. That is what I submitted, I don't know if it is
part o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391
--- Comment #3 from pnewell at cs dot cmu.edu 2011-12-03 03:11:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 25975
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25975
this is the bad output I am getting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391
--- Comment #2 from pnewell at cs dot cmu.edu 2011-12-03 03:10:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 25974
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25974
this is the header file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391
--- Comment #1 from pnewell at cs dot cmu.edu 2011-12-03 03:10:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 25973
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25973
this is the source file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391
Bug #: 51391
Summary: pragma GCC diag ignored then warning of Winline
activates -fno-inline
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFI
11 matches
Mail list logo
