--- Comment #5 from pmaconi at gmail dot com 2008-05-08 05:58 ---
Sorry. When I ran that code from visual studio, rand() always returned no more
than 5 digits. I didn't realize that RAND_MAX was different between the
compilers.
--
pmaconi at gmail dot com changed:
--- Comment #3 from pmaconi at gmail dot com 2008-05-08 03:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=15617)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15617&action=view)
Test .cpp file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36178
--- Comment #2 from pmaconi at gmail dot com 2008-05-08 03:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=15616)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15616&action=view)
Output file from --save-temps (.s)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36178
--- Comment #1 from pmaconi at gmail dot com 2008-05-08 03:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=15615)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15615&action=view)
Output file from --save-temps
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36178
y: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pmaconi at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36178
