http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46544
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Mach 2010-11-19
13:12:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> As a general rule, if you see in the code mentioned a "DR XXX.
> YYY", with _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS before, it means we are implementing a
> change bey
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46544
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Mach 2010-11-19
11:13:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Thanks for clarifiying.
> As you can clearly see
It wasn't that clear to me. As a user of g++ and C++, and as a programmer, I am
not into every DR, as I am
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46544
Summary: std::map::at() defined even if
__GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ is not
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
--- Comment #4 from phresnel at gmail dot com 2010-07-07 06:55 ---
Little update: I "re-opened" this report at
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11793 .
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44841
--- Comment #3 from phresnel at gmail dot com 2010-07-07 06:29 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> >
> > undefined reference to `vtable for IFoo'
> > Suggestions:
> >* Ensure that no (pure) member function of `IFoo'
ct: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: phresnel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44841
I've searched several of the other Wunitialized reports, but without deeper
knowledge, I wasn't able to conclude whether this is a dup.
Note that even if i happens to be zero-initialized, it is only in this
strapped-down testcase. In the program I am hacking, I got an out-of-bound of
roughly 2^31
RMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: phresnel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41995
--- Comment #6 from phresnel at gmail dot com 2009-11-06 09:32 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > I guess win32 doesn't know about aligned commons? Try updating to 4.4.2.
> >
> > You can a
--- Comment #5 from phresnel at gmail dot com 2009-11-06 09:24 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > I guess win32 doesn't know about aligned commons? Try updating to 4.4.2.
>
> You can also use -fno-common as a workaround.
>
Unfortunat
10 matches
Mail list logo
