https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #214 from Peter Bisroev ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #213)
> Does this still happen with GCC 8 or above?
Hi Andrew, yes it does from my last tests. As we have found out here, before
newer versions of GCC can work on HP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97976
--- Comment #10 from Peter Bisroev ---
Jonathan, thank you so much for your explanation. As soon as I read it, it all
started to make sense.
>You cannot increment or decrement a pointer past the end of an array (except
>the one past the end pos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97976
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bisroev ---
Thank you for your response Jonathan.
If you have a minute, could you please clarify a few things. I have been
talking about this behavior with a few colleagues and we are all slightly
confused by the same i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97976
Peter Bisroev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bisroev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97976
Peter Bisroev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97976
Peter Bisroev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97976
Bug ID: 97976
Summary: Optimization regression in 10.1 for lambda passed as
template argument
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
