[Bug c++/22550] ICE in vrp_evaluate_conditional

2005-07-18 Thread paul dot woegerer at nsc dot com
-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known to fail||4.1.0 Known to work|

[Bug c++/22550] New: ICE in vrp_evaluate_conditional

2005-07-18 Thread paul dot woegerer at nsc dot com
Summary: ICE in vrp_evaluate_conditional Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: paul dot woegerer at nsc dot com

[Bug c++/22545] ICE with pointer to class member & user defined conversion operator

2005-07-18 Thread paul dot woegerer at nsc dot com
-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known to fail||4.1.0 Known to work|

[Bug c++/22545] New: ICE with pointer to class member & user defined conversion operator

2005-07-18 Thread paul dot woegerer at nsc dot com
rity: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: paul dot woegerer at nsc dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linu

[Bug tree-optimization/22321] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong code with SSA dominator optimizations

2005-07-06 Thread paul dot woegerer at nsc dot com
--- Additional Comments From paul dot woegerer at nsc dot com 2005-07-06 13:47 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Also I will note that this target is not in FSF's tree so there is no way to reproduce it either. I've already submitted the crx-port some time ago. http://gcc.g

[Bug tree-optimization/22321] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong code with SSA dominator optimizations

2005-07-06 Thread paul dot woegerer at nsc dot com
--- Additional Comments From paul dot woegerer at nsc dot com 2005-07-06 13:38 --- I used snapshot 4_1_20050508. After updating the crx-port to the latest snapshot (4_1_20050702) the bug disappeared. -- Sorry for inconvenience. (Its a pity that bugzilla doesn't let me

[Bug c++/22321] [4.1 Regression] Wrong code with SSA dominator optimizations

2005-07-06 Thread paul dot woegerer at nsc dot com
--- Additional Comments From paul dot woegerer at nsc dot com 2005-07-06 10:55 --- Sorry i thought this trivial test case is self-explanatory. I would expect that main returns 0. Two pointers pointing to the same volatile int should compare to equal (as they do when I disable

[Bug c++/22321] [4.1 Regression] Wrong code with SSA dominator optimizations

2005-07-06 Thread paul dot woegerer at nsc dot com
-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Known to work||3.4.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=

[Bug c++/22321] New: [4.1 Regression] Wrong code with SSA dominator optimizations

2005-07-06 Thread paul dot woegerer at nsc dot com
dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: paul dot woegerer at nsc dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: crx-unknown-elf http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22321

[Bug c/22230] [4.1 Regression] value range propagation error

2005-06-29 Thread paul dot woegerer at nsc dot com
-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22230

[Bug c/22230] New: [4.1 Regression] value range propagation error

2005-06-29 Thread paul dot woegerer at nsc dot com
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: paul dot woegerer at nsc dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: crx-unknown-elf http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22230