[Bug target/111403] LoongArch: Wrong code with -O -mlasx -fopenmp-simd

2024-01-31 Thread panchenghui at loongson dot cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111403 --- Comment #8 from Chenghui Pan --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4) > After r14-5545 this issue became latent. > > And at some point before r14-5545 this issue became nondeterministic: a > compiled program *sometimes* crashes. Really

[Bug target/111424] LoongArch: Enable vect test suite

2023-10-12 Thread panchenghui at loongson dot cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111424 --- Comment #3 from Chenghui Pan --- vect.exp is enabled in master branch for now, but there's some check_effective_target procs in gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp that seems need modifying for enabling more vectorization tests.

[Bug target/111424] LoongArch: Enable vect test suite

2023-09-17 Thread panchenghui at loongson dot cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111424 --- Comment #1 from Chenghui Pan --- I also addressed some failed testcases with -mlsx/-mlasx enabled and try to resolve them by adding dg-options and etc. or editing target-supports.exp to append loongarch directives. (May submit to maillist la

[Bug rtl-optimization/110939] [14 Regression] 14.0 ICE at rtl.h:2297 while bootstrapping on loongarch64

2023-08-08 Thread panchenghui at loongson dot cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939 --- Comment #10 from Chenghui Pan --- (In reply to Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus from comment #9) > Thanks for the reproducer and sorry for the hassle. > > The normal form of a constant for a mode with fewer bits than in > HOST_WIDE_INT is a sign

[Bug rtl-optimization/110939] [14 Regression] 14.0 ICE at rtl.h:2297 while bootstrapping on loongarch64

2023-08-08 Thread panchenghui at loongson dot cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939 --- Comment #8 from Chenghui Pan --- (In reply to Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus from comment #6) > I tried to reproduce it with a cross compiler while using the reproducer > from PR110867 without getting an ICE. Can you attach a pre processed sou

[Bug rtl-optimization/110939] [14 Regression] 14.0 ICE at rtl.h:2297 while bootstrapping on loongarch64

2023-08-08 Thread panchenghui at loongson dot cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939 --- Comment #7 from Chenghui Pan --- Created attachment 55706 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55706&action=edit preprocessed file of gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.cc, ICE occurred in this place.

[Bug rtl-optimization/110939] [14 Regression] 14.0 ICE at rtl.h:2297 while bootstrapping on loongarch64

2023-08-08 Thread panchenghui at loongson dot cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939 --- Comment #4 from Chenghui Pan --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > I think this was reported before (and fixed by r14-2932-g41ef5a34161356). > Can you try again with updated GCC? I still get the exact same ICE message with upd

[Bug rtl-optimization/110939] [14 Regression] 14.0 ICE at rtl.h:2297 while bootstrapping on loongarch64

2023-08-08 Thread panchenghui at loongson dot cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939 --- Comment #2 from Chenghui Pan --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > I think this was reported before (and fixed by r14-2932-g41ef5a34161356). > Can you try again with updated GCC? Ok, I clone a new copy of codes and is bootstra

[Bug bootstrap/110939] New: 14.0 ICE at rtl.h:2297 while bootstrapping on loongarch64

2023-08-07 Thread panchenghui at loongson dot cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110939 Bug ID: 110939 Summary: 14.0 ICE at rtl.h:2297 while bootstrapping on loongarch64 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri