--- Comment #9 from p dot mateja at sh dot cvut dot cz 2006-05-12 00:31
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > > Pavel, the attiny2313 has 128 Bytes of SRAM.
> >
> > I know. But there has to be way how to
--- Comment #8 from p dot mateja at sh dot cvut dot cz 2006-05-11 23:56
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Pavel, the attiny2313 has 128 Bytes of SRAM.
>
> I know. But there has to be way how to address it's 2kB flash.
> I don't nee
--- Comment #7 from p dot mateja at sh dot cvut dot cz 2006-05-11 23:39
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Pavel, the attiny2313 has 128 Bytes of SRAM.
I know. But there has to be way how to address it's 2kB flash.
I don't need the string in SRAM.
--
http://gcc.gnu
--- Comment #6 from p dot mateja at sh dot cvut dot cz 2006-05-11 23:36
---
> What is needed is described on the GCC web site here:
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html>
> Please take a quick look.
Sorry, I have already read that, but I had a very long day today.
It'
--- Comment #5 from p dot mateja at sh dot cvut dot cz 2006-05-11 23:27
---
Created an attachment (id=11440)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11440&action=view)
preprocessed file (*.i*) that triggers the bug
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27556
--- Comment #2 from p dot mateja at sh dot cvut dot cz 2006-05-11 21:42
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> That's not a complete testcase, which we need to reproduce/fix the bug.
What do you need?
Complete source is:
cat >test.c <
int main(void)
{
UBRRH = 0;
code generation when cross compile for attiny2313
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: p dot mateja at sh
