--- Comment #5 from oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2009-01-12 07:58 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Oh well. If your change will fix it, I'm happy...
Thx for the information!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36025
--- Comment #3 from oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2009-01-07 16:20 ---
Please have a look at this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-04/msg00033.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36025
--- Comment #4 from oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2008-05-14 19:41 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Regarding gnat; Can we use this ticket for tracking the problem?
>
> No, please file a new bug. Or is this the same as PR 36025?
Oh yes. Sorry,
--- Comment #2 from oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2008-05-13 10:49 ---
Finally I have a working gcc 4.3.0, although I had to disable gnat compilation,
as there's some error. With gcc 4.3.0 ustr compiles, so this really is fixed.
Regarding gnat; Can we use this ticket for trackin
Summary: "cpu_set_t" not declared in "OS_Interface" compilation
problem on alpha
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigne
s!
Sorry, if the component is wrong.
--
Summary: gcc bug on alpha
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-11-23 07:55 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> a testcase or even the error which you get would be nice. Also you might want
> to try 4.2.2.
I don't have 4.2.2 yet. I could try changing the existing specfile and and
build i
unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: oliver at linux-kernel dot at
GCC build triplet: alpha-redhat-linux
GCC host triplet: alpha-redhat-linux
GCC target triplet: alpha-redhat-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34185
--- Comment #2 from oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-05-10 16:58 ---
Richard. It might be a Fedora problem. Yes. But can you help me to track it
down? gcc maintainer from Fedora will not really help me, as Fedora doesn't
have support for Alpha, that's part of the AlphaCore
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: oliver at linux-kernel dot at
GCC build triplet: alpha-redhat-linux
GCC host triplet: alpha-redhat-linux
GCC target triplet: alpha-redhat-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31894
--- Comment #11 from oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-04-10 17:23 ---
Andrew. It's OK. write_barrier() is fine in Fedora Development. But
read_barrier() is missing in libjava/sysdep/alpha/lock.h. Just forget it :-)
Thx!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30424
--- Comment #9 from oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-04-10 17:11 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I don't have an Alpha to test, but I can see read_barrier() in HEAD:
>
> inline static void
> read_barrier()
> {
> __asm__ __volatile__("mb" : : : "
--- Comment #7 from oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-04-10 15:44 ---
Same problem happens on alpha. read_barrier is not defined in sysdeps/locks.h.
Added read_barrier with a simple __sync_synchronize, but I guess this will not
work in real life... Just for testing... Can please check
13 matches
Mail list logo
