--- Comment #9 from numerical dot simulation at web dot de 2010-09-15
09:03 ---
Hi!
Looks like http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#502
now has a resolution, namely that a type is dependent if it is
a nested class or enumeration that is a member of the current
--- Comment #6 from numerical dot simulation at web dot de 2010-05-03
12:53 ---
Hi!
Though I love the fact that this code now compiles, I am still unsure whether
this is the right thing to have.
>From http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#502 I see
>tha
--- Comment #4 from numerical dot simulation at web dot de 2007-04-23
17:24 ---
Sorry, the link was wrong, must be
http://groups.google.de/group/comp.lang.c++.moderated/browse_thread/thread/8c3b8a84ed78b003/4d9603171894a75d?hl=de#4d9603171894a75d
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #3 from numerical dot simulation at web dot de 2007-04-18
07:51 ---
I started a discussion about this code on
comp.lang.c++.moderated, subject
"enum in template memfun in class template - valid C++?"
see
<http://groups.google.com/groups/pro
--- Comment #2 from numerical dot simulation at web dot de 2007-04-16
10:31 ---
The compiler at
http://www.comeaucomputing.com/tryitout/
has absolutely no problems with the code.
M$-VC8 says:
error C2754: 'C::Dispatcher' : a partial specialization cannot have
a dependen
P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: numerical dot simulation at web dot de
GCC host triplet: i586-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31584
