https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114741
Bug ID: 114741
Summary: [14 regression] aarch64 sve: unnecessary fmov for
scalar int bit operations
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113874
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112987
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113552
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112987
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111478
--- Comment #1 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
see also bug 111479
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111479
Bug ID: 111479
Summary: [12/13 regression] aarch64 SVE ICE: in
compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:248
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111478
Bug ID: 111478
Summary: [12/13/14 regression] aarch64 SVE ICE: in
compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:250
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106671
--- Comment #12 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jiangning Liu from comment #11)
> Hi Wilco,
>
> > "it means we will need a linker optimization to remove those redundant BTIs
> > (eg. by changing them into NOPs)"
>
> It will be onl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106671
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104689
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105160
Bug ID: 105160
Summary: [12 regression] ipa modref marks functions with asm
volatile as const or pure
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104689
Bug ID: 104689
Summary: aarch64: libgcc: DW_CFA_val_expression is not
supported for RA_SIGN_SATE register
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102768
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104504
Bug ID: 104504
Summary: spurious -Wswitch-unreachable warning with
-ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102768
--- Comment #3 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
well, protection mechanisms are rarely equivalent. neither scs nor
traditional stack protector are perfect.
to me compiler support for freestanding environments such as linux
makes sense. i cannot i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102768
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100354
Bug ID: 100354
Summary: [9 regression] aarch64: non-deligitimized UNSPEC
UNSPEC_TLS (76) found in variable location
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99551
Bug ID: 99551
Summary: aarch64: csel is used for cold scalar computation
which affects performance
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98747
Bug ID: 98747
Summary: aarch64: __ARM_FEATURE_MEMORY_TAGGING is defined on
ilp32
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98618
--- Comment #5 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #3)
> I fixed this in GCC10:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git&a=commit;
> h=7d3b27ff12610fde9d6c4b56abc70c6ee9b6b3db
>
> So this just needs to be backported.
than
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98618
--- Comment #4 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #1)
> Is the test case really valid? It involves an out-of-bounds array access,
> after all.
sorry you are right the indexes are too far, a better test is
lo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98618
--- Comment #2 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #1)
> Is the test case really valid? It involves an out-of-bounds array access,
> after all.
no it doesn't, n is signed long and its value can be such that th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98618
Bug ID: 98618
Summary: aarch64: oob adrp offset causes relocation truncated
to fit: R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21
Product: gcc
Version: 8.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98251
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97638
Bug ID: 97638
Summary: aarch64: bti c is missing at function entry with
branch-protection
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97321
Bug ID: 97321
Summary: add warning for pointer casts that may lead to
aliasing violation when dereferenced
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
27 matches
Mail list logo
