[Bug tree-optimization/115777] New: Severe performance regression on insertion sort at -O2 or above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115777 Bug ID: 115777 Summary: Severe performance regression on insertion sort at -O2 or above Product: gcc Version: 14.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/115590] Bad dereferences through -> operator not detected by sanitizers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115590 --- Comment #3 from nrk at disroot dot org --- > I am not 100% sure want to keep these around even at -O0 since they don't > have any behavior effect. I'd strongly argue that if you're using sanitizers, you'd want these to be caught :) Also wo

[Bug sanitizer/115590] New: Bad dereferences through -> operator not detected by sanitizers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115590 Bug ID: 115590 Summary: Bad dereferences through -> operator not detected by sanitizers Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/96503] attribute alloc_size effect lost after inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96503 nrk at disroot dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nrk at disroot dot org --- Comme

[Bug c/111665] New: internal compiler error: in c_objc_common_truthvalue_conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111665 Bug ID: 111665 Summary: internal compiler error: in c_objc_common_truthvalue_conversion Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/110676] [11/12/13/14 Regression] strlen of array[1] should not be optimized to 1 if using ASAN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110676 --- Comment #3 from nrk at disroot dot org --- Oops, forgot about https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107395. But that bug was for missed warning opportunity, while this one is about ASan. So I suppose both the bugs can coexist.

[Bug sanitizer/110676] New: builtin optimization prevents ASan from detecting OOB reads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110676 Bug ID: 110676 Summary: builtin optimization prevents ASan from detecting OOB reads Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/107395] Missed warning opportunity on builtin string optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107395 --- Comment #2 from nrk at disroot dot org --- That c++ warning is unrelated to the bug report, it's warning about initialization; which you can easily replace them with { 'h' } and { 'h', 'i' } to silence; but not warning about the fact that non

[Bug tree-optimization/107395] New: Missed warning opportunity on bultin string optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107395 Bug ID: 107395 Summary: Missed warning opportunity on bultin string optimization Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug analyzer/106620] Incorrectly thinks execution can continue after a return statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106620 --- Comment #3 from nrk at disroot dot org --- > Feel free to reopen it if you're able to reproduce it with gcc 12 or later Huh, I linked to godbolt specifically because I wanted to test gcc 12 and see if the bug still persists or not since my l

[Bug analyzer/106620] New: Incorrectly thinks execution can continue after a return statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106620 Bug ID: 106620 Summary: Incorrectly thinks execution can continue after a return statement Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/104288] New: Null pointer check invalidly deleted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104288 Bug ID: 104288 Summary: Null pointer check invalidly deleted Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c