[Bug middle-end/103438] Updated documentation for gcc Optimization command line options (sec 3.11)

2021-12-02 Thread nils.smeds at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103438 --- Comment #14 from Nils Smeds --- OK, the wording "aggressive" makes it look counter-intuitive that it is set at -O0, but apparently it is correct. /Nils On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 3:02 PM marxin at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wr

[Bug middle-end/103438] Updated documentation for gcc Optimization command line options (sec 3.11)

2021-12-02 Thread nils.smeds at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103438 --- Comment #13 from Nils Smeds --- OK, then it makes sense On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 3:02 PM marxin at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103438 > > --- Comment #12 from Martin Liška

[Bug middle-end/103438] Updated documentation for gcc Optimization command line options (sec 3.11)

2021-12-02 Thread nils.smeds at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103438 --- Comment #11 from Nils Smeds --- I also noticed the following with this patch (if I applied it correctly) [tooladmin@login2302 gcc-11.2.0]$ gcc -O0 -Q --help=optimize t.c | grep agg -faggressive-loop-optimizations [enabled] [tooladm

[Bug middle-end/103438] Updated documentation for gcc Optimization command line options (sec 3.11)

2021-12-02 Thread nils.smeds at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103438 --- Comment #10 from Nils Smeds --- Is there a benefit to augment the -Q output as follows? [tooladmin@login2302 build]$ diff -r -p a b diff -r -p a/gcc/opts.c b/gcc/opts.c *** a/gcc/opts.cWed Jul 28 08:55:07 2021 --- b/gcc/opts.c

[Bug middle-end/103438] Updated documentation for gcc Optimization command line options (sec 3.11)

2021-11-26 Thread nils.smeds at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103438 --- Comment #8 from Nils Smeds --- (In reply to Nils Smeds from comment #7) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > > Lemme take a look. > > Great, thanks. prefetch-loop-arrays appears to be activated on arm,s390 and i386 at level -O3

[Bug middle-end/103438] Updated documentation for gcc Optimization command line options (sec 3.11)

2021-11-26 Thread nils.smeds at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103438 --- Comment #7 from Nils Smeds --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > Lemme take a look. Great, thanks. What happens in real life inside the code is beyond me, I am mostly after that the documentation should describe what is really

[Bug middle-end/103438] Updated documentation for gcc Optimization command line options (sec 3.11)

2021-11-26 Thread nils.smeds at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103438 --- Comment #4 from Nils Smeds --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > -fprefetch-loop-arrays is not enabled by default on all targets. $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 11.2.0 Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free so

[Bug c/103438] New: Updated documentation for gcc Optimization command line options (sec 3.11)

2021-11-26 Thread nils.smeds at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103438 Bug ID: 103438 Summary: Updated documentation for gcc Optimization command line options (sec 3.11) Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n