--- Comment #4 from nicos at maunakeatech dot com 2008-03-15 01:07 ---
I think I need some help here, I looked to bug 323 and I can't see how it is
related to this issue.
The assertion at the end of the test case compares integers, and the iFloor
function is only applied to 0 i
--- Comment #2 from nicos at maunakeatech dot com 2008-03-14 16:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=15318)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15318&action=view)
Preprocessed testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35585
--- Comment #1 from nicos at maunakeatech dot com 2008-03-14 16:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=15317)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15317&action=view)
Testcase to reproduce the bug
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35585
Summary: Miscompiled inline assembly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nicos at maunakeat
--- Comment #3 from nicos at maunakeatech dot com 2005-12-20 09:20 ---
I was under the belief that out of class definitions of const static integral
members was optional for gcc and that static const N = k; was equivalent to
enum { N = k};, was I wrong ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
well with static integral member
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nicos at maunakeatech dot com
tus: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nicos at maunakeatech dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23077
