https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57378
Nikolay Bogoychev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nheart at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90260
--- Comment #2 from Nikolay Bogoychev ---
Hey Martin,
I know clang doesn't support that. I have opened a separate bug report there
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41613
Based on some discussions on their mailing lists, it seems like this
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nheart at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 46252
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46252&action=edit
Templated function multiversioning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89929
--- Comment #24 from Nikolay Bogoychev ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #23)
> (In reply to Nikolay Bogoychev from comment #22)
> > Hey,
> >
> > I was reading through the mailing list discussion (
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89929
--- Comment #22 from Nikolay Bogoychev ---
Hey,
I was reading through the mailing list discussion (
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-04/msg00757.html ) and I want to say
that currently code like
void __attribute__ ((target("avx512dq")))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89929
--- Comment #19 from Nikolay Bogoychev ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #18)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #17)
> > >
> > > @Martin:
> > >
> > > Thank you for the detailed answer. This could work for now. I have a few
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89929
--- Comment #16 from Nikolay Bogoychev ---
Created attachment 46187
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46187&action=edit
target("arch=foo") doesn't work
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #15)
> @Nikolay:
>
> As discussed
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nheart at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 46163
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46163&action=edit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89929
--- Comment #10 from Nikolay Bogoychev ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> > Ok, let me first focus on the functional part of the patch.
> > If I'm correct feature_list in get_builtin_code_for_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89929
--- Comment #5 from Nikolay Bogoychev ---
Created attachment 46080
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46080&action=edit
multiple attributes weirdnes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89929
--- Comment #4 from Nikolay Bogoychev ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> > In addition, it seems that gcc recognizes this as valid syntax:
> >
> > __attribute__((target("avx512bw", "avx512f")))
> >
> > But actually ignores everyth
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nheart at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 46075
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46075&action=edit
testcase for a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79819
--- Comment #2 from Nikolay Bogoychev ---
> This attachment is a pain, is there really a need for each loader_file.ii to
> be in its own tar file?
No, there isn't really. I didn't realize I could only attach one file so I
merged everything.
> A
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nheart at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 40874
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40874&action=edit
console output from
14 matches
Mail list logo
