https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224
Neil Booth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||neilb at protonmail dot ch
--- Comment #38
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119798
Bug ID: 119798
Summary: Preprocessor skipping since C17 and C++17
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: prep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58687
Neil Booth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||neilb at protonmail dot ch
--- Comment #36
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119391
--- Comment #6 from Neil Booth ---
Yes, the problem isn't that evaluation isn't in intmax_t (so the subject is now
incorrect). That clearly happens as there are hundreds of tests that would
fail.
The problem is that cpp thinks it's undefined b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119391
Bug ID: 119391
Summary: Rejects valid
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
Assignee: