[Bug target/118280] [14/15/16 Regression] __atomic_test_and_set in Microblaze are broken (exposed by r14-4286)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118280 Neal Frager changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #61760|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/118280] [14/15/16 Regression] __atomic_test_and_set in Microblaze are broken (exposed by r14-4286)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118280 --- Comment #22 from Neal Frager --- Hello everyone, Could we ask for a review / request for comment of the attached patch which will enable atomic test and set support for microblaze? Please note that this solution requires the -mxl-barrel-sh

[Bug target/118280] [14/15/16 Regression] __atomic_test_and_set in Microblaze are broken (exposed by r14-4286)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118280 --- Comment #21 from Neal Frager --- Created attachment 61761 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61761&action=edit test case for microblaze atomic test and set support Attached is a test case for verifying the atomic test and

[Bug target/118280] [14/15/16 Regression] __atomic_test_and_set in Microblaze are broken (exposed by r14-4286)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118280 --- Comment #20 from Neal Frager --- Created attachment 61760 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61760&action=edit microblaze atomic test and set patch Attached is a proposal for adding atomic test and set support to the micro

[Bug target/118280] [14/15/16 Regression] __atomic_test_and_set in Microblaze are broken (exposed by r14-4286)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118280 Neal Frager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||neal.frager at amd dot com --- Comment #1