--- Comment #8 from nam3l3ss dot bugreportaccount at gmail dot com
2008-01-04 15:53 ---
I checked again, actually, even the second "bugok" file is a silent failure on
the written environment, so the segfault is kind of an improvement there, but I
could swear the origin
--- Comment #5 from nam3l3ss dot bugreportaccount at gmail dot com
2008-01-04 03:31 ---
Of course, if you add the check for the appropriate type of end iterator right
before the find gets called, the problem goes away without a trace.
Btw and imho, the worst thing that find may get as
--- Comment #4 from nam3l3ss dot bugreportaccount at gmail dot com
2008-01-04 03:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=14873)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14873&action=view)
THIS is the working, 32bit, older compiler generated version.
Forgot to add -save-temp
--- Comment #3 from nam3l3ss dot bugreportaccount at gmail dot com
2008-01-04 02:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=14872)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14872&action=view)
This is the working, 32bit, older compiler generated version.
--
http://gcc.
--- Comment #1 from nam3l3ss dot bugreportaccount at gmail dot com
2008-01-03 15:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=14867)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14867&action=view)
Full, preprocessed source code.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34650
UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nam3l3ss dot bugreportaccount at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34650
