--- Comment #3 from myselfhimself at free dot fr 2007-12-04 21:03 ---
I did some research
this bug has already reported in as 19808
implementation work for it is probably started as I have found this page
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Better_Uninitialized_Warnings
*** This bug has been
--- Comment #4 from myselfhimself at free dot fr 2007-12-04 21:03 ---
*** Bug 34307 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
myselfhimself at free dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from myselfhimself at free dot fr 2007-12-04 20:37 ---
Hi
this is to say that my first example was not a problem so sorry for posting.
a conclusion is that c++ tolerates nameless parameter names even in function
definition.
As to the second example, Andrew Pinski, you
under Linux 2.6.20, KUbuntu Gutsy with gcc 4.1.3
compiling for use on linux
#if 0
//first here:
//g++ accepts to compile no parameter name is given anytime (not in the class
definition neither in the constructor implementation)
//the program runs ok though
#include
using namespace std;
class Ho
