https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107785
Muggle Wei changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107785
--- Comment #4 from Muggle Wei ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Unsigned integer types are defined to be wrapping types which is why it
> works with that.
Indeed! It was my fault, appreciate for your answer!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107785
--- Comment #3 from Muggle Wei ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Unsigned integer types are defined to be wrapping types which is why it
> works with that.
Thanks for the reply, I had thought that integer overflow would only aff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107785
Bug ID: 107785
Summary: Integer comparison result compile with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
