[Bug bootstrap/93765] Bootstrap comparison failure; gcc/tree-vect-loop.o differs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93765 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 CC

[Bug web/100480] Where to file complaints re project-maintainers?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100480 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug driver/78206] bootstrap failure under Apple sandbox that blacklists reads in /usr/local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78206 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug objc/80912] enhancement: -Wundeclared-selector improvements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80912 --- Comment #3 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes, what you say seems reasonable.

[Bug objc/80912] enhancement: -Wundeclared-selector improvements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80912 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug c++/87380] Explicit instantations should use weak symbols on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87380 --- Comment #18 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- So, didn't you just say that it works on darwin8 and later and is broken on darwin7? If so, then darwin8.h needs the #define (since it is the first version where ar has been fixed). ?

[Bug c++/87380] Explicit instantations should use weak symbols on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87380 --- Comment #14 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- You can test it if you can dump the ar symbol table, with a assembled .s file. Nothing needs to work except the assembler and ar and the tool to dump the symbol table. In the olden days, there

[Bug c++/87380] Explicit instantations should use weak symbols on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87380 --- Comment #13 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ah, yes, likely it would be ar that has changed. Anyway, the ld version is a cheap indirect proxy for bugs in ar. We're likely to get new ar versions with new ld versions. A real config te

[Bug c++/87380] Explicit instantations should use weak symbols on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87380 --- Comment #12 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- I changed the test case around, and the linker seems to be able to resolve from a .a now: $ ar -q liblib.a lib.o $ nm -m liblib.a liblib.a(lib.o): 0020 (__TEXT,__eh_frame) non-external

[Bug c++/87380] Explicit instantations should use weak symbols on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87380 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug jit/64089] libgccjit.so.0.0.1 linkage failure on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089 --- Comment #21 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm fine with Backporting for affected branches.

[Bug jit/64089] libgccjit.so.0.0.1 linkage failure on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089 --- Comment #19 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm fine with Backporting for affected branches.

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: unrecognizable insn: internal compiler error on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: unrecognizable insn: internal compiler error on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #39 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Thu Feb 8 18:48:37 2018 New Revision: 257501 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257501&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-08 Iain Sandoe PR targ

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: unrecognizable insn: internal compiler error on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #38 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Thu Feb 8 18:39:43 2018 New Revision: 257500 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257500&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Mark previous change with: PR target/84113 Modified:

[Bug bootstrap/81037] Xcode 9 requires back ports on gcc-5-branch and gcc-6-branch for bootstrapping under Xcode 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81037 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug testsuite/79867] [cygwin] LD_LIBRARY_PATH ignored, contaminating (nearly?) all test results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79867 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug testsuite/79867] [cygwin] LD_LIBRARY_PATH ignored, contaminating (nearly?) all test results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79867 --- Comment #2 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Mon Apr 10 17:45:35 2017 New Revision: 246813 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246813&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-04-10 Daniel Santos PR testsui

[Bug driver/78206] bootstrap failure under Apple sandbox that blacklists reads in /usr/local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78206 --- Comment #6 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Mon Nov 7 19:17:04 2016 New Revision: 241926 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241926&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-06 Jack Howarth PR driv

[Bug driver/78206] bootstrap failure under Apple sandbox that blacklists reads in /usr/local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78206 --- Comment #5 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Mon Nov 7 18:35:50 2016 New Revision: 241920 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241920&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-06 Jack Howarth PR driv

[Bug driver/78206] bootstrap failure under Apple sandbox that blacklists reads in /usr/local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78206 --- Comment #4 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Mon Nov 7 18:33:49 2016 New Revision: 241919 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241919&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-06 Jack Howarth PR driv

[Bug target/60563] FAIL: g++.dg/ext/sync-4.C on *-apple-darwin*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563 --- Comment #13 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- The change in c12 is ok if you'd like to do that. The only problem with it is that then we will not be able to discover when radr://19802258 is fixed. When people notice that that bug is

[Bug tree-optimization/77654] restrict pointer attribute not preserved with -fprefetch-loop-arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77654 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug target/63890] [4.9/5 regression] Compiling trivial program with -O -p leads to misaligned stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890 --- Comment #31 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Does anyone have handy logs for: FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/profile1.C -std=gnu++11 execution test FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/profile1.C -std=gnu++14 execution test FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law

[Bug target/63890] [4.9/5/6 regression] Compiling trivial program with -O -p leads to misaligned stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890 --- Comment #26 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Certainly adding TARGET_MACHO is Ok by me.

[Bug bootstrap/57438] bootstrap fails on x86_64 darwin in stage2 linking cc1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438 --- Comment #23 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- On the platform, external symbols are defined to be 1 or more bytes. 0 is not one or more. Once that is fixed, then the problem goes away. If you want to have Apple update their abi for future

[Bug testsuite/68629] FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-simd-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68629 --- Comment #9 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Necessary, no. I'd defer to others if they think it is better in the cilk area. Makes sense to me, if someone wants to do that.

[Bug testsuite/68629] FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-simd-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68629 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/67973] All the tests for -gstabs* fail on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with Xcode 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67973 --- Comment #17 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- A back port is Ok.

[Bug testsuite/68629] FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-simd-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68629 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/67710] FAIL: gcc.dg/darwin-*version-*.c (test for excess errors) with Xcode 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67710 --- Comment #8 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ok.

[Bug target/68772] Many -gstabs tests FAIL with Xcode 7 as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68772 --- Comment #5 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- The work checked in above is unrelated to this PR.

[Bug target/68774] gcc should allow disabling markup in Xcode 7 assembler messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68774 --- Comment #1 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- I glanced around and didn't find how to turn it off. First step, ask around and find the option to turn it off. From there, we can pass it when the gcc option to not color is given.

[Bug rtl-optimization/68623] New: lra doesn't check predicate after reloading an early clobber

ormal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mrs at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- lra doesn't check the predicate after reload an output register to ensure the instruction remains valid. The predic

[Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773 --- Comment #34 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- So, for bugs that aren't fixed, sometimes we work around them. We can use this bug to track things like the vendor bug status (fixed or not), and potential workarounds. Plus, we can list thi

[Bug inline-asm/61692] ICE in extract_insn in recog.c for asm with many parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692 --- Comment #5 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Mine. Mine supports 33. Don't expect it to go past 40. Most folks won't. In 10-30 years, maybe we might need to update to 50, but we can do that then.

[Bug inline-asm/61692] ICE in extract_insn in recog.c for asm with many parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/68269] [5/6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr68129_1.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68269 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|target --- Comment #5 from mrs

[Bug rtl-optimization/68269] [5/6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr68129_1.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68269 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/66728] [5 Regression] CONST_WIDE_INT causes corrupted DWARF debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Known to work

[Bug debug/66728] [5 Regression] CONST_WIDE_INT causes corrupted DWARF debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728 --- Comment #11 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Mon Nov 9 18:27:43 2015 New Revision: 230039 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230039&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/66728 * dwarf2out.c (get_

[Bug debug/66728] [5/6 Regression] CONST_WIDE_INT causes corrupted DWARF debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC

[Bug debug/66728] [5/6 Regression] CONST_WIDE_INT causes corrupted DWARF debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728 --- Comment #8 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Fri Nov 6 20:16:06 2015 New Revision: 229885 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229885&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/66728 * dwarf2out.c (get_

[Bug middle-end/66311] [5 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work

[Bug middle-end/66311] [5 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 --- Comment #20 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Sat Oct 17 03:55:03 2015 New Revision: 228932 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228932&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-10-16 Richard Sandiford PR middle-e

[Bug middle-end/34010] [4.9 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010 --- Comment #16 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- I checked https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-04/msg01438.html and the failure is gone.

[Bug target/67973] All the tests for -gstabs* fail on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with Xcode 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67973 --- Comment #2 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ah, found it, use the GNU assembler. Maybe a little tricky, as one day, even that will be removed. At that point, I think we just reject the -gstabs option. The other option, is to just reject

[Bug target/67973] All the tests for -gstabs* fail on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with Xcode 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67973 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug boehm-gc/66848] boehm-gc fails test suite on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug jit/64089] libgccjit.so.0.0.1 linkage failure on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 --- Comment #9 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- I've audited the patch for the memory management nightmares; we are safe with it.

[Bug target/66523] the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11 fails on libobjc/NXConstStr.m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66523 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work

[Bug target/66523] the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11 fails on libobjc/NXConstStr.m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66523 --- Comment #19 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Thu Jul 9 17:56:23 2015 New Revision: 225624 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225624&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-07-09 Iain Sandoe PR targ

[Bug target/66523] the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11 fails on libobjc/NXConstStr.m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66523 --- Comment #18 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Thu Jul 9 17:50:58 2015 New Revision: 225623 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225623&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-07-09 Iain Sandoe PR targ

[Bug target/66523] the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11 fails on libobjc/NXConstStr.m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66523 --- Comment #15 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Jack, can you spin a gcc-4.9 test?

[Bug target/66523] the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11 fails on libobjc/NXConstStr.m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66523 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work

[Bug target/66523] the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11 fails on libobjc/NXConstStr.m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66523 --- Comment #13 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Wed Jul 8 16:56:46 2015 New Revision: 225565 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225565&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-07-08 Iain Sandoe PR targ

[Bug target/66523] the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11 fails on libobjc/NXConstStr.m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66523 --- Comment #11 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- No, but one has to get RM approval. Should be easy enough to get that, as long as the work gets done before they make the last snapshot. Does someone have the regression test done on the release

[Bug target/66523] the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11 fails on libobjc/NXConstStr.m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66523 --- Comment #9 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ok. Ok for all active release branches.

[Bug target/66523] the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11 fails on libobjc/NXConstStr.m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66523 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/66509] the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11 fails on the libjava/java/lang/reflect/natArray.cc file from FSF gcc 5.1 at -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509 --- Comment #25 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Fri Jul 3 17:50:48 2015 New Revision: 225400 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225400&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-07-03 Jack Howarth PR targ

[Bug libitm/52482] libitm INVALID MNEMONIC in .S (powerpc asm)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482 --- Comment #17 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fink's 4.7 has to be patched by itself, if you would like the fix there.

[Bug libitm/52482] libitm INVALID MNEMONIC in .S (powerpc asm)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug libitm/52482] libitm INVALID MNEMONIC in .S (powerpc asm)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482 --- Comment #15 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Fri Jul 3 17:35:37 2015 New Revision: 225390 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225390&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-07-03 Carlos Sánchez de La Lama PR targ

[Bug libitm/52482] libitm INVALID MNEMONIC in .S (powerpc asm)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482 --- Comment #14 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Fri Jul 3 17:31:21 2015 New Revision: 225389 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225389&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-07-03 Carlos Sánchez de La Lama PR targ

[Bug libitm/52482] libitm INVALID MNEMONIC in .S (powerpc asm)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482 --- Comment #13 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Fri Jul 3 17:28:43 2015 New Revision: 225388 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225388&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-07-03 Carlos Sánchez de La Lama PR targ

[Bug target/66509] the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11 fails on the libjava/java/lang/reflect/natArray.cc file from FSF gcc 5.1 at -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509 --- Comment #24 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Fri Jul 3 17:00:49 2015 New Revision: 225386 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225386&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-07-03 Jack Howarth PR targ

[Bug target/66509] the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11 fails on the libjava/java/lang/reflect/natArray.cc file from FSF gcc 5.1 at -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509 --- Comment #22 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes. It cleanly applies to the 5 branch and the 4.9 branch. Let me know how a build and test cycle goes on both, and I propose to drop it into both.

[Bug target/66509] the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11 fails on the libjava/java/lang/reflect/natArray.cc file from FSF gcc 5.1 at -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Target Milestone

[Bug target/66509] the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11 fails on the libjava/java/lang/reflect/natArray.cc file from FSF gcc 5.1 at -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509 --- Comment #19 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Tue Jun 30 02:10:43 2015 New Revision: 225158 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225158&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/66509 * configure.ac: Fix f

[Bug middle-end/34010] [4.9 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.3 |--- --- Comment #14 from mrs

[Bug target/66509] the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11 fails on the libjava/java/lang/reflect/natArray.cc file from FSF gcc 5.1 at -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/63810] gcc sets incorrect macro for OS X deployment targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work

[Bug target/63810] gcc sets incorrect macro for OS X deployment targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810 --- Comment #26 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Thu May 28 12:27:05 2015 New Revision: 223808 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223808&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-05-28 Lawrence Velázquez PR targ

[Bug target/63810] gcc sets incorrect macro for OS X deployment targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/61352] gcc 4.9.0 fails to execute dsymutil when linking executables on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352 --- Comment #12 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Wed May 6 00:33:49 2015 New Revision: 222835 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222835&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-05-05 Jack Howarth Backport from

[Bug middle-end/34010] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/63890] [4.9/5 regression] Compiling trivial program with -O -p leads to misaligned stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890 --- Comment #17 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm happy to defer the question to the person that reviews the patch for the tree. I'd like a codegen type person that understands the proposed change to review it. They may feel

[Bug target/63890] [4.9/5 regression] Compiling trivial program with -O -p leads to misaligned stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890 --- Comment #15 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Substantially changing code gen 2 days before release with inadequate testing is slightly dangerous; seem more appropriate for stage 1.

[Bug bootstrap/65150] [5 Regression] r220875 causes bootstrap failure on x86_64 darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/63892] [5 Regression] gcc.dg/sibcall-3.c fails on darwin with -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892 Bug 63892 depends on bug 65150, which changed state. Bug 65150 Summary: [5 Regression] r220875 causes bootstrap failure on x86_64 darwin https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/63890] [4.9/5 regression] Compiling trivial program with -O -p leads to misaligned stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major --- Comment #10 from mrs

[Bug target/63890] [4.9/5 regression] Compiling trivial program with -O -p leads to misaligned stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890 --- Comment #9 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is caused by: --- ChangeLog (revision 203170) +++ ChangeLog (revision 203171) @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2013-10-03 Jan Hubicka + + * i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal): Do not enable

[Bug target/63890] [4.9/5 regression] Compiling trivial program with -O -p leads to misaligned stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/65150] [5 Regression] r220875 causes bootstrap failure on x86_64 darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150 --- Comment #16 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- My take, Jakub should review/approve it. The the people with darwin boxes can check any proposed patch to ensure the testcases in question pass and ensure the bootstrap works and there are no

[Bug bootstrap/65150] r220875 causes bootstrap failure on x86_64 darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC

[Bug rtl-optimization/30957] Misscompare with variable expansion optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30957 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug libffi/64855] FAIL: libffi.call/* -W -Wall -Wno-psabi -O0 -DABI_NUM=* -DABI_ATTR=* execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64855 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug libffi/64855] FAIL: libffi.call/* -W -Wall -Wno-psabi -O0 -DABI_NUM=* -DABI_ATTR=* execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64855 --- Comment #7 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Thu Jan 29 22:09:16 2015 New Revision: 220264 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220264&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-01-29 Jack Howarth PR libffi/64855 * t

[Bug libgomp/64635] darwin produces libgomp-plugin-host_nonshm.1.dylib but tries to load libgomp-plugin-host_nonshm.so.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64635 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug libgomp/64635] darwin produces libgomp-plugin-host_nonshm.1.dylib but tries to load libgomp-plugin-host_nonshm.so.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64635 --- Comment #25 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Wed Jan 28 21:25:19 2015 New Revision: 220220 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220220&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-01-28 Jack Howarth PR libgo

[Bug libgomp/64635] darwin produces libgomp-plugin-host_nonshm.1.dylib but tries to load libgomp-plugin-host_nonshm.so.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64635 --- Comment #24 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Wed Jan 28 21:23:14 2015 New Revision: 220218 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220218&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-01-28 Jack Howarth PR libgo

[Bug libobjc/51891] class_copyIvarList crashes on empty ivars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51891 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug libobjc/51891] class_copyIvarList crashes on empty ivars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51891 --- Comment #4 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Fri Jan 9 18:12:51 2015 New Revision: 219399 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219399&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Added PR libobjc/51891. Modified: trunk/gcc/t

[Bug target/63651] Lot of failures in obj(c|-c++) with yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651 --- Comment #16 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- We can fixincludes NS_BLOCKS_AVAILABLE support back in, this would disappear interfaces that cannot be supported. In the past, this was a safe thing to do, and might well be still safe wrt the

[Bug target/57792] toplevel configure should enable "--with-sysroot="`xcrun --show-sdk-path`"" for darwin13 and later

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57792 --- Comment #15 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Mandating commands line tools is fine. Would be nice if everything worked flawlessly if no optional package had to be installed, but I'm pragmatic.

[Bug target/61387] [5 Regression] ~900 test failures on on x86_64-apple-darwin13 for g++ with -m64 after r211089

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/61387] [5 Regression] ~900 test failures on on x86_64-apple-darwin13 for g++ with -m64 after r211089

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387 --- Comment #15 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Tue Oct 7 18:59:24 2014 New Revision: 215983 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215983&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-10-07 Iain Sandoe PR targ

[Bug target/61387] [5 Regression] ~900 test failures on on x86_64-apple-darwin13 for g++ with -m64 after r211089

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387 --- Comment #13 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- I like Ian's change the best. I've sent that to gcc-patches for consideration.

  1   2   3   >