[Bug libstdc++/99430] New: std::filesystem::path: UNC device paths with \\?\… not supported properly

2021-03-06 Thread moritz at bunkus dot org via Gcc-bugs
: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: moritz at bunkus dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50317 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50317&action=edit test case highlight

[Bug libstdc++/99333] std::filesystem::path().is_absolute() thinks UNC paths aren't absolute

2021-03-02 Thread moritz at bunkus dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99333 --- Comment #4 from Moritz Bunkus --- Oh right, sorry — I misread your earlier comment.

[Bug libstdc++/99333] std::filesystem::path().is_absolute() thinks UNC paths aren't absolute

2021-03-02 Thread moritz at bunkus dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99333 --- Comment #2 from Moritz Bunkus --- The following code tests forward & backward slashes with both std::filesystem (gcc 10.2.0, mingw via MXE) and boost::filesystem (Boost 1.74.0): auto slashes = R"(//server/share/file.txt)"s; auto back

[Bug libstdc++/99333] New: std::filesystem::path().is_absolute() thinks UNC paths aren't absolute

2021-03-01 Thread moritz at bunkus dot org via Gcc-bugs
ormal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: moritz at bunkus dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50280 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50280&action=edit test case Compil

[Bug libstdc++/99311] New: std::filesystem::exists & std::filesystem::create_directories don't work correctly with UNC paths

2021-02-28 Thread moritz at bunkus dot org via Gcc-bugs
n: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: moritz at bunkus dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50270 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attac

[Bug target/86832] [8/9 Regression] GCC v8.2.0 tries to use native TLS with -fstack-protector-strong on Windows (mingw-w64)

2018-11-23 Thread moritz at bunkus dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86832 Moritz Bunkus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||moritz at bunkus dot org --- Comment

[Bug c++/59949] default value to std::function template function parameter causes »already defined« messages in assembler

2014-01-26 Thread moritz at bunkus dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59949 --- Comment #1 from Moritz Bunkus --- Created attachment 31955 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31955&action=edit compiler output with g++ 4.8.2

[Bug c++/59949] New: default value to std::function template function parameter causes »already defined« messages in assembler

2014-01-26 Thread moritz at bunkus dot org
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: moritz at bunkus dot org Created attachment 31954 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31954&action=edit

[Bug c++/55805] New: Empty brace-init-list causes warning "missing initializer for member" in C++11

2012-12-25 Thread moritz at bunkus dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55805 Bug #: 55805 Summary: Empty brace-init-list causes warning "missing initializer for member" in C++11 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug c++/54325] New: C++11 uniform initialization syntax for argument-less abstract base class constructor fails

2012-08-19 Thread moritz at bunkus dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325 Bug #: 54325 Summary: C++11 uniform initialization syntax for argument-less abstract base class constructor fails Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1

[Bug c++/20916] va_list passed to a function gets messed up by a call to another function

2005-04-09 Thread moritz at bunkus dot org
--- Additional Comments From moritz at bunkus dot org 2005-04-09 16:25 --- Ups! Thanks for the quick help and sorry for not reading the man page thoroughly enough before posting this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20916

[Bug c++/20916] va_list passed to a function gets messed up by a call to another function

2005-04-09 Thread moritz at bunkus dot org
--- Additional Comments From moritz at bunkus dot org 2005-04-09 12:31 --- Forgot to mention: compilation was done with a simple "g++ -Wall -o va_list_messed_up va_list_messed_up.cpp" -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20916

[Bug c++/20916] va_list passed to a function gets messed up by a call to another function

2005-04-09 Thread moritz at bunkus dot org
--- Additional Comments From moritz at bunkus dot org 2005-04-09 12:30 --- Created an attachment (id=8570) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8570&action=view) output of "g++ -v" on that platform -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20916

[Bug c++/20916] va_list passed to a function gets messed up by a call to another function

2005-04-09 Thread moritz at bunkus dot org
--- Additional Comments From moritz at bunkus dot org 2005-04-09 12:30 --- Created an attachment (id=8569) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8569&action=view) preprocessed file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20916

[Bug c++/20916] va_list passed to a function gets messed up by a call to another function

2005-04-09 Thread moritz at bunkus dot org
--- Additional Comments From moritz at bunkus dot org 2005-04-09 12:29 --- Created an attachment (id=8568) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8568&action=view) source code for the sample case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20916

[Bug c++/20916] New: va_list passed to a function gets messed up by a call to another function

2005-04-09 Thread moritz at bunkus dot org
a call to another function Product: gcc Version: 3.4.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: moritz at bunkus dot org