[Bug c/94196] New: Multiple issues with attributes

2020-03-16 Thread momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: momchil.velikov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 48046 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48046&action=edit reproducer/examples Taking as an example the noreturn attribute. It is document

[Bug target/92808] New: GCC sets BTI flag in .note.gnu.property section even though not all functions are compiled with BTI

2019-12-04 Thread momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: momchil.velikov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- When GCC compiles the following source ``` __attribute__((target("branch-protection=pa

[Bug c++/60994] gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier

2015-02-12 Thread momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60994 --- Comment #9 from Momchil Velikov --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00659.html(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > Have you pinged your patch? If a patch isn't reviewed within a week or two, > you should ping it on gcc

[Bug c++/64418] New: User-defined conversion not properly suppressed in certain cases of list-initialisation

2014-12-27 Thread momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: momchil.velikov at gmail dot com Consider the example: --- 8< -- struct C { C(const C &); }; struct X { operator C() const; }; C a{X()}; --- 8< --

[Bug c++/59366] A friend function template defined in a class is found without ADL

2014-05-05 Thread momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59366 --- Comment #1 from Momchil Velikov --- Proposed fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00198.html

[Bug c++/60994] gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier

2014-04-29 Thread momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60994 --- Comment #5 from Momchil Velikov --- Proposed fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01938.html

[Bug c++/60994] gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier

2014-04-29 Thread momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60994 --- Comment #3 from Momchil Velikov --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1) > Implicit enum to int conversion is not provided for a scoped enumeration. This is not the reported error. In fact, the correct output of the compiler wou

[Bug c++/60994] New: gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier

2014-04-29 Thread momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: momchil.velikov at gmail dot com gcc version 4.10.0 20140428 (experimental) (GCC) Compiling (with c++ -c -std=c++11 b.cc) the following program enum struct A { n = 3

[Bug c++/60755] lambda capturing `this` doesn't honor const qualifier of the enclosing member function

2014-04-12 Thread momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60755 Momchil Velikov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||momchil.velikov at gmail dot com

[Bug c++/60463] Lambda function can call a non-const member function with const this

2014-04-12 Thread momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60463 Momchil Velikov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||momchil.velikov at gmail dot com