[Bug middle-end/42688] gcc 4.3.3 with -O2 thinks a often non-zero expression is always zero

2010-02-07 Thread mnemo at minimum dot se
--- Comment #5 from mnemo at minimum dot se 2010-02-07 21:34 --- The gzipped output is also too big for this bugzilla instance to handle. It should be easy for you to download the *.tar.gz from the description and just run "gcc -E -O2" on it. -- http://gcc.gnu.or

[Bug c/42688] gcc 4.3.3 with -O2 thinks a often non-zero expression is always zero

2010-01-17 Thread mnemo at minimum dot se
--- Comment #3 from mnemo at minimum dot se 2010-01-17 15:39 --- I tried to attach the output of "gcc -E -O2 sqlite3.c" but it's 1.5MB and bugzilla rejects anything bigger than 1KB. Even the unmodified source is larger than this limit, even though you can download it via

[Bug c/42688] gcc 4.3.3 with -O2 thinks a often non-zero expression is always zero

2010-01-17 Thread mnemo at minimum dot se
--- Comment #2 from mnemo at minimum dot se 2010-01-17 15:34 --- Using gcc 4.4.1, I see this: 1. "gcc -O2 sqlite3.c" repros the bug 2. "gcc -E sqlite3.c > pp.c" followed by "gcc -O2 pp.c" does _NOT_ repro the bug However, still using gcc 4.4.1, if I do:

[Bug c/42688] New: gcc 4.3.3 with -O2 thinks a often non-zero expression is always zero

2010-01-11 Thread mnemo at minimum dot se
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: mnemo at minimum dot se http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42688

[Bug c++/41575] New: GCC lists private methods as candidates in "no matching function for call"

2009-10-05 Thread mnemo at minimum dot se
normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: mnemo at minimum dot se http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41575

[Bug c/39525] [easy to fix bug] Docs for C99 "designated initializers" isn't clear what happens to omitted field members

2009-03-23 Thread mnemo at minimum dot se
--- Comment #2 from mnemo at minimum dot se 2009-03-23 13:48 --- If you could just add that info in a single sentence to the GCC docs, it would be very helpful for end users. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39525

[Bug c/39525] New: [easy to fix bug] Docs for C99 "designated initializers" isn't clear what happens to omitted field members

2009-03-23 Thread mnemo at minimum dot se
ot org ReportedBy: mnemo at minimum dot se http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39525