http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52103
--- Comment #3 from mlg 2012-02-04 09:50:39 UTC ---
> You can use C++11 explicit override control
Since it is a lot of existing code, I'm afraid I'd have to
have _them_ used override 5 or 10 or so years ago.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52103
--- Comment #1 from mlg 2012-02-03 09:14:36 UTC ---
$ g++ --version
g++ (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4) 4.5.2
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. [...]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52103
Bug #: 52103
Summary: need a finer control over -Woverloaded-virtual
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47940
--- Comment #6 from mlg 2011-03-01 17:23:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> >
> > Functions that call pure virtual functions cannot
> > be called from constructors and destructors.
> > This may be discovered at compi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47940
--- Comment #2 from mlg 2011-03-01 11:34:30 UTC ---
Yes it _is_ hard to detect. My colleague was suspecting
a build system bug/feature at first (hours for a full rebuild).
If it was a direct call, there would be a linker error.
>If the call was d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47940
Summary: can call a pure virtual from a constructor/destructor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assig
--- Comment #2 from mlg7 at yandex dot ru 2008-11-21 08:44 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> The expanded text for the first one is:
> int t = 1|2 & 0xFF00 ? dothis(1|2) : dothat(1|2);
>
> Maybe I am missing something here.
>
the human who is writing
int t =
t: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mlg7 at yandex dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38179
uct: gcc
Version: 4.3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mlg7 at yandex dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38053
