[Bug fortran/115265] Generic function for constructor not invoked for same-name derived type with procedure pointer component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115265 --- Comment #10 from Matthew Krupcale --- Thanks Jerry! I think you may also have to backport the fix [1] for PR118640 to avoid regression on the 14 branch as well. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=3600b1ff14a459e84bb40bdfea7c

[Bug fortran/115265] Generic function for constructor not invoked for same-name derived type with procedure pointer component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115265 --- Comment #6 from Matthew Krupcale --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #5) > Neither PR is a regression and defined assignment is so fundamentally > incorrect, where defined assignment of components is concerned, that > sticking plaster

[Bug fortran/115265] Generic function for constructor not invoked for same-name derived type with procedure pointer component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115265 --- Comment #3 from Matthew Krupcale --- Hey Paul, Great, thanks for adding this testcase. Is there any change the fix in PR109066 will be applied to older branches, e.g. 13 and 14? Matthew

[Bug fortran/109066] Segfault when using defined assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109066 Matthew Krupcale changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mkrupcale at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug fortran/115265] New: Generic function for constructor not invoked for same-name derived type with procedure pointer component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115265 Bug ID: 115265 Summary: Generic function for constructor not invoked for same-name derived type with procedure pointer component Product: gcc Version: unknown