http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47861
--- Comment #12 from Michal Turlik 2011-02-24
11:48:10 UTC ---
Yep the Meyer singleton!
T* instance()
{
static T instance;
return
&instance;
}
The trouble probably comes from this one...where the
static definition comes from?
Redi...I onl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47861
--- Comment #10 from Michal Turlik 2011-02-24
11:15:51 UTC ---
redi,
the signatures where wrong, the correct ones are:
Base* Base::next
(bool)
void Base::init()
btw you got the point - I mean you understood
how the code buggy is.
a better warn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47861
--- Comment #7 from Michal Turlik 2011-02-24
09:44:53 UTC ---
Well guys it is probably silly but you need to consider a more specific
case.
Base*
MyClass::next(bool reset)
{
static Bases::iterator it
= m_bases.begin();
if(reset)
it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47861
Summary: static variables inside member functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...
