http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54331
Michael Richmond changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54331
Bug #: 54331
Summary: configure: error: C++ compiler missing or
inoperational
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53175
Bug #: 53175
Summary: Fortran 4.8 undefined reference to a variable in a
module
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49242
--- Comment #4 from Michael Richmond
2011-10-14 12:13:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> May be related to bug 50709.
>
> Michael, did you use --disable-checking configure option?
I used --enable-checking=release
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49242
--- Comment #2 from Michael Richmond
2011-08-11 00:37:19 UTC ---
Yes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49769
Summary: Configuration mismatch -- extra parts
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49242
Summary: Bootstrap comparison failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48908
Michael Richmond changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.a.richmond at nasa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851
--- Comment #2 from Michael Richmond
2011-05-03 14:01:53 UTC ---
I believe it is a compiled compiler. Here are the two instructions that
immediately precede the error messages:
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --tag=disable-static --mode=compile
/hom
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851
Summary: lto-plugin.c:224:7: error: missing sentinel in
function call [-Werror=format]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #10 from Michael Richmond
2011-02-01 16:18:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> As a workaround for the reporter, dynamic linking works fine.
When I use "gfortran -Bdynamic call_date_and_time.f90" I get the same error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #4 from Michael Richmond
2011-02-01 15:27:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> OP, what does "ldd /path/to/libgfortran.so.3" say?
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0xb772b000)
libc.so.6 => /li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
Summary: undefined reference to clock_gettime in Linux build of
02/01/2011
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47362
Michael Richmond changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47362
Summary: genconstants.c:68: undefined reference to `_
__chkstk_ms' on 01/15/2011 snapshot
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46825
--- Comment #2 from Michael Richmond
2010-12-06 17:04:06 UTC ---
I used gfortran -c g.f90
I did not see this bug in any other port dated 20101204. I did not see it in
any MinGW port prior to 20101204.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46825
Summary: ICE compiling modules with MinGW build dated 20101204
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assign
17 matches
Mail list logo