https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119151
--- Comment #15 from Michael Leuchtenburg ---
I've been running this backported to 14.2.0 for a bit now with good results.
Found some other incompatibilities with our own code related to the changed
malloc pattern relative to pre-btree code (ins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119151
--- Comment #13 from Michael Leuchtenburg ---
Created attachment 60724
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60724&action=edit
unit stress test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119151
--- Comment #12 from Michael Leuchtenburg ---
It looks like the failures I was continuing to see in our use-case were indeed
a test configuration issue as they are now passing, using my old patch. The new
change is functionally the same, it just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119151
--- Comment #5 from Michael Leuchtenburg ---
Some additional eyes on the algorithm change would be quite welcome. I think
I've missed something as I'm still getting some similar crashes, albeit at a
lower rate. The tree structure has the same fl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119151
Michael Leuchtenburg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60671|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119151
--- Comment #1 from Michael Leuchtenburg ---
Created attachment 60671
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60671&action=edit
the fix I described
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119151
Bug ID: 119151
Summary: unwind-dw2-btree maintains separators wrong
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: li