http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56184
Bug #: 56184
Summary: Internal compiler error in push_reload during
bootstrap stage 2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50946
Matthew Gretton-Dann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mgretton at sourceware dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51799
Matthew Gretton-Dann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.2
Summary|Compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51799
Bug #: 51799
Summary: Compiler ICE in vect_is_simple_use_1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51301
Bug #: 51301
Summary: Compiler ICE in vect_is_simple_use_1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50978
--- Comment #5 from Matthew Gretton-Dann
2011-11-03 16:43:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I think I found it: an incredibly stupid error. The contents of arm/t-bpabi
> was moved to libgcc, with the exception of EXTRA_HEADERS. I missed tha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50978
--- Comment #2 from Matthew Gretton-Dann
2011-11-03 15:45:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> > Current SVN fails to build libgcc for an arm-none-eabi target because it
> > can't
> > find unwind-arm-common.h:
> >
> > In file included from
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50978
Bug #: 50978
Summary: libgcc build fails - unable to find
unwind-arm-common.h
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50873
--- Comment #2 from Matthew Gretton-Dann
2011-10-27 13:31:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I see this too, but I don't think it's my patch's fault. I reverted it and the
> reduced test still failed. The patch makes no difference for this bas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50873
Bug #: 50873
Summary: The fix to PR50730 causes
gcc.c-torture/unsorted/dilayout.c to ICE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50729
--- Comment #3 from Matthew Gretton-Dann
2011-10-14 13:49:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 25500
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25500
VRP1 Analysis and resultant tree
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50729
--- Comment #2 from Matthew Gretton-Dann
2011-10-14 13:49:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 25499
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25499
Tree just before VRP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50729
--- Comment #1 from Matthew Gretton-Dann
2011-10-14 13:40:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 25498
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25498
Cutdown pre-processed non-executable testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50729
Bug #: 50729
Summary: Silent code gen fault: Value range propagation seems
to propagate values across narrowing/widening
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50727
Bug #: 50727
Summary: ICE with segfault in flow_bb_inside_loop_p
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50717
--- Comment #3 from Matthew Gretton-Dann
2011-10-13 15:50:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 25486
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25486
Incorrect tree output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50717
--- Comment #2 from Matthew Gretton-Dann
2011-10-13 15:49:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 25485
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25485
Correct tree output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50717
--- Comment #1 from Matthew Gretton-Dann
2011-10-13 15:49:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 25484
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25484
Single function testcase (not executable)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50717
Bug #: 50717
Summary: Silent code gen fault with incorrect widening of
multiply
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50576
Matthew Gretton-Dann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50576
--- Comment #2 from Matthew Gretton-Dann
2011-09-30 10:58:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> is sizeof(long long) == sizeof (double)?
Yes - sizeof(long long) and sizeof(double) are both 8.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50576
Bug #: 50576
Summary: Recent vector comparison changes cause an ICE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48061
Matthew Gretton-Dann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48061
Summary: Internal compiler error in spill_failure
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassi
24 matches
Mail list logo
