http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48773
--- Comment #6 from Matthew Fortune 2011-05-04
16:19:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> This is a known issue introduced by the DF merge. I think that the current
> state of affairs is that the passes consuming REG_DEAD/REG_UNUSED notes have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48773
Matthew Fortune changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.3.5 |4.6.0
--- Comment #4 from Matthew Fortu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48773
--- Comment #2 from Matthew Fortune 2011-04-28
12:00:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 24125
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24125
ce3 dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48773
--- Comment #3 from Matthew Fortune 2011-04-28
12:01:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 24126
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24126
nothrow dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48773
--- Comment #1 from Matthew Fortune 2011-04-28
11:59:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 24124
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24124
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48773
Summary: Dataflow and REG_DEAD notes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23551
Matthew Fortune changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mfortune at gmail dot com
--- Comment
